Labour Market Politics through Jurisprudence: The Influence of the Judgements of the European Court of Justice (Viking, Laval, Ruffert, Luxembourg) on Labour Market Policies
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
1 Introduction At end of 2007 European Court of Justice (ECJ) went through several extremely controversial judgements which contained juridical and political explosives. The important decisions on Viking (ECJ, Case C-438/05 Viking (2007) ECR I-10779-10840) and Laval (ECJ, Case C-341/05 Laval (2007) ECR I-11767-118904) dealt with compatibility of national collective labour law with requirements of European law and have imposed as a consequence restrictions on strike action by trade unions. In judgements on Ruffert (ECJ, Case C-346/06 Ruffert (2008) ECR I-1989) and Commission against Luxembourg (ECJ, Case C-319/06, NZA 2008: 865), collective agreement clauses in public procurement law and a national implementation legislation of posting of workers directive were declared contrary to community law. In judgements economic freedoms have been systematically prioritised against fundamental social rights. The decisions produced widespread debates not only in European countries concerned. Critics warned of a radicalization of internal market integration with negative consequences for European welfare states (see different sources on: http://www.etui.org/Headline-issues/Viking-Laval-Rueffert-Luxembourg). The fear is not new that national scope of action is limited by European regulations, but sharp reaction indicate, that it now has come to a new level of restrictions: national institutions of negotiating partners and decision arenas are targeted and limited, a field on which countries until now could operate freely. Cologne -based political economist Fritz Scharpf even calls for a boycott of judgements: the only way is not to follow (Scharpf 2008: 19 ff.). The cases not only raise question of relation between European law and national law, but have impacts on national industrial relations systems and therefore on labour market policies of member states. The countries are under pressure to respond to judgements and have to adjust their policies accordingly. Regarding consequences of decisions on Viking - Laval - Ruffert and Luxembourg it is necessary however to differentiate between national systems. Due to diversity of different systems of industrial relations, impact of cases differ from country to country. The scope of action of governments, national trade unions and employers' organizations is restricted to differing degrees by ECJ decisions. This leads to a reduction of rights of workers and trade unions. In this analysis, it will be shown how member states, which were trigger for respective ECJ decisions or which are particularly effected by judgements, respond to ECJ jurisprudence - although article cannot cover issue conclusively. 2 Historical background The European Community (EC) was started in 1957 as a project of market based upon idea of four liberties: free movement of goods, services, capital and persons. Trade barriers were reduced between EC member states to achieve a common market in Europe. The European Economic Community's scope was limited to economic policy with social policy being excluded. The guiding principle was that individuals from other member states should enjoy same rights as nationals concerning terms of investment, access to labour market, trade in goods and provisions of services. The European Institutions (Commission and ECJ) were given task by treaties to ensure that these principles were upheld. Since then Commission and ECJ gradually empowered themselves and increasingly shifted boundaries between national law and European law at expense of member states (Hopner 2008: 2). The enhancement of fundamental freedoms was based upon idea to form project of European Union on basis of a gradual market extension. Although social policy initiatives tried to correct market-processes in terms of a positive integration, EU policy primarily focussed on establishment of economic freedom of movement. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».