Notice bibliographique
Résumé
John 18:33-37 race mercy and peace in the name of the Father and of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.Today we celebrate the kingship of Christ, it is Christ the King Sunday.But in our time and context the use of titles as kings and queens may not mean anything to us.The kings and queens we are familiar with now are all just titular heads with little or no power vested in them.We are more familiar with the titles of Prime Minister or President, depending on where one comes from.Just like kings and emperors of Jesus' time our modern day equivalents also are associated with power and dominance, or strength and subjugation.In this context what are we to make of the gospel reading for the day?We have reached the final Sunday of the liturgical year.After Pentecost we have been in the ordinary time of the church calendar when we focused on Christian living and discipleship and this final Sunday of the church year is designated to acknowledge the eternal kingship of Christ.This particular text presents the truth of this kingship which stands in contrast to the human misunderstanding of Pontius Pilate.He could not really comprehend the truth of Jesus' authority condemns him to a deadly fate.Jesus is brought by the Jews from the house of Caiaphas to the headquarters of Pontius Pilate, the Roman prefect of Judaea.Pilate asks Jesus, "Are you the King of the Jews?"This question by Pilate to Jesus is in all of the Gospels, but what follows in John is unique to that gospel.In the synoptic gospels or the first three gospels, Jesus responds in the affirmative, and does not say anything more.In John, however, Jesus not only offers an answer but also poses a counter question.Jesus' response to Pilate in a sense shows the inappropriateness of the question asked and also Pilate's misunderstanding of what he was asking about.As New Testament scholars are fond of saying, Jesus is on trial in the other gospels whereas Pilate is on trial in the Gospel of John.How could we understand the kingship of Jesus?What are our perceptions of this king that we worship?Ludwig Feuerbach, the German philosopher, talks of the human understanding of the Divine as the elevation of the human nature to an infinite degree.God is seen as all knowing, all powerful and all virtuous.Regarding the kingship of Christ, although this passage from John 18 (and others like it) gives us a picture that is contrary to the expected perception of kingship, we also expect an all-powerful, all conquering Christ, who will triumph over all.The Song of Herod from Jesus Christ Superstar voices Herod's expectations of the King of the Jews.Are not our expectations of Jesus Christ also very much in line with Herod's?We are also overjoyed to be followers of this famous person who heals cripples and raises the dead.We too ask him to prove his divinity by changing water into wine or by walking across swimming pools, or do something fantastic that will impress us and the world, or ask him for everything under the sun.1 Rev. Mathai is the pastor at Mt.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,017 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,013 | 0,028 |
| Communication savante | 0,010 | 0,012 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,007 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,005 | 0,007 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,029 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».