Exploring a More Holistic Approach to the Realization of Socio-Economic Rights in Third World States
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The current approaches to the realization of socio-economic rights tend to exist in relative silos, and are as such all limited in their effectiveness. Many such approaches exist, but the ones focused on in this paper are the “mainstream”, “Critical Legal Studies” (CLS), “Third World Approaches to International Law” (TWAIL), and “Political Economy” (PE) approaches. By “mainstream”, I refer to a perspective that is based on a strict and formal interpretation of international law as it is currently couched in the recognized sources of international law, and a similar understanding of the international and domestic legal orders. By “CLS”, I refer to a Western “Critical Legal Studies” perspective that criticizes legal language as a false discourse that helps perpetuate hierarchies. By “TWAIL”, I refer to the perspective of a school of thought referred to as “Third World Approaches to International Law” that is unified by historical and contemporary concerns regarding the position of Third World peoples in the global political and economic structure, particularly within international law. By “PE”, I refer to an approach that tries to understand the historical and current links between the economy and political power and how they influence each other.Thus far, each of these schools of thought has developed its own approach to rights discourse/action in general, and socio-economic rights discourse/action in particular. There has been little attempt to combine the differing approaches to these questions, so as to produce a much more holistic and effective harmonized approach to the problem of generating the kind of ideas that can lead to the significant amelioration of socio-economic rights violations in the Third World. The value of synergizing these differing approaches is illustrated, among others, by the fact that in order to better understand the (legal, political, and economic) structural and other factors that stand in the way of the greater global re-distribution of socio-economic resources (thereby ameliorating Third World socio-economic hardships), TWAIL and PE insights must be taken into much greater account by mainstream socio-economic rights scholarship. And even CLS-style socio-economic rights scholarship will profit from this kind of engagement with TWAIL and PE approaches. There is thus an obvious necessity for a more holistic approach to the question of the production of ideas concerning the realization of socio-economic rights in the Third World; one that is much more synergistic and integrated than has otherwise been the case.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».