A survey of work related accidents induced death in Public service and Green space laborers of Tehran Municipality in 2004-2005
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background and Aim: Work related accidents cause the death of thousands of laborers annually. According to United States National Protection Agency the rate of disabilities resulted from work related accidents have increased from 5.9% in 1961 to 10.87% in 1976. The ILO data shows that in the EU, with the exception of England and Holland, every 6 in 100 thousand workers lost their lives due to work related accidents. The same figure is, 7 in Australia, 7 in Canada, 4 in Japan, 7 in Switzerland, 6 in Austria, 7 in Belgium, 3 in Denmark, 5 in Germany, 4 in Greece, 3 in Holland, 6 in Portugal, 10 in Spain 6 in Sweden and 16 in Turkey. The published data in Iran Shows that 14706 work-related accidents occurred in 1982, the mentioned data doesn't show the real number of accidents it merely shows those of which reported by work inspectors. Materials and Methods: The design of the study was case series. Public service and green space laborers of Tehran Municipality who have died during 2004- 2005 due to work related accidents were studied. Following the report of each accident a questionnaire containing question about the different aspects of the accident and the characteristics died person was completed by the health inspectors. The questionnaires were gathered and the data was analyzed. Findings: Totally 9 cases of deaths following work related accidents were reported in 2004 and 6 cases in 2005 which caused a total number of 67500 person-day work loss in 2004 and 45000 person-day work loss in 2005. Considering the fact that the number of the laborers were 21000 annually; it means 43 deaths in every 100 thousand workers in 2004 and 26 deaths in every 100 thousand workers in 2005. The leading cause of death in 2004 were driving accidents which in 22.5% of them the laborers had not used necessary safety equipments and in 66.5% the drivers were culprit. The remaining 11.5% were due to other reasons. In 2005 the leading cause of death was driving accidents again which in 67% of them the laborers had not used necessary safety equipments and in 33% the drivers were culprit. Language: fa
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,019 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».