Engaging children, youth and families - more than a good idea.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Relationships, intent, commitment and a little serendipity – the ingredients that create the magic that make the real difference toward improving the mental health of children, youth and their families. Flashback…2003…a new wet behind the ears psychiatrist and a passionate parent advocate crossed paths and unbeknownst to each it would lead to a partnership, friendship and shared desire to create a future where children, youth and their families could flourish, succeed in life and be understood and valued. Flashforward…2010…here we are co-guest editing this special issue of the Journal on engaging children, youth and families in all aspects of child and youth mental health. We have attempted to secure articles that can speak to the importance and necessity of engaging children, youth and families to inform and improve systems, policies, practices, programs and research. There is no doubt that full engagement is possible and fruitful as described by Spencer, Blau & Mallery in their article on the impact of “family-driven” care in America. As they point out there are facilitating steps which promote the success and uptake of engagement with children, youth and families. However, as Goplan et al. recognize, engaging families into mental health treatment remains a serious challenge. This is not an insurmountable hurdle; however, it is one that impedes efforts to engage when there is only so much time, limited resources and too many kids in crisis – impacting not only the families but also all those working in the systems – all of whom would benefit from the engagement. Parents and families in this country are thinking and worried about their children’s mental health. In 2009, Today's Parent Magazine published a Healthy Kids 2009 series which featured four topic areas; mental health, fitness and nutrition, environment and health, and injury prevention. As noted in Anderson et al., the Editor of the magazine stated that mental health was the most powerful of the four topics. The youth with lived experience that were engaged in developing the framework for the BC Provincial Family Council, co-chaired by a youth and a parent, stated that a primary motivator for their engagement was their worry about having children and the potential impact of their own mental health on their kids and their children’s risk of developing mental health concerns as noted in Davidson, et al. When provided an opportunity, youth and families are very frank and contribute significant energy in describing what worked, what they need and what they hope for. This is clearly evident in Chovil & Panagiotopoulos who engaged families in determining the health literacy needs related to the use of second-generation antipsychotic medications. Each article in this special issue demonstrates the importance of relationships, intent, commitment and a little serendipity. How does one achieve this? We and these authors know that these ingredients were necessary to bring about the engagement that they desired. Find other champions and be champions together. It is the magic of relationships that make possibilities real. “Real isn’t how you are made,” said the Skin Horse. “It’s a thing that happens to you.” (The Velveteen Rabbit or How Toys Become Real, Margery Williams). Guest Editors, Jana Davidson and Keli Anderson
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,026 | 0,047 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,009 | 0,023 |
| Communication savante | 0,019 | 0,039 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,016 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,014 | 0,037 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,011 | 0,005 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».