Place, Self, Power, and Agency Shaping International Students’ Lives
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In the past few years internationalization has become one of the biggest missions of Canadian post secondary institutions. Thus, the number of visible minority and international faculty members and students has grown significantly in Canadian Universities (Altbach and Knight, 2007). In 2010, international students represented approximately eight percent of full-time undergraduate students in Canada, approximately 18 percent of full-time master’s students, and 23 percent of full-time PhD students (AUCC, 2011). In Canada, the majority of these students come from Asian countries (including Middle East). Among these Asian countries some send far more students other than other. Iran, for example, with a nearly 20% increase from 2010 to 2011, with 3,892 students (1.63% of total IS population in Canada) sits in 9 th place in the top 10 sender countries. This is while currently, Iranian students in Canada are affected differently by the limited relations and political context between two countries, Iran and Canada (Pinch, 2012). While Iranian international students move to Canada with the hopes of a better education and life compared to their home countries, they face social and psychological challenges due to some reasons, such as lack of support, discriminatory policies/attitudes, and prejudice. According to a 2012 BBC World Service poll, only 9% of Canadians have a positive view about Iran, and 81% express a negative view. Such a negative attitude towards their homeland, along with policies and actions that exert pressure to their lives makes Iranian students struggle for their well-being in Canada (e.g. embassy closures both in Iran and Canada). Considering the importance of being attentive to international students’ lives, the important question is “how can researchers, educators, and policy makers help international students’ social and psychological well-being?” I believe the first step in getting a proper response for such a question is to ask “How do international students experience life in a new country/place such as Canada?” This question will take us to the very lives of international students, their social interactions and experiences which shape who they are and how they think. In this paper, I will review and elaborate on some key elements, such as place/space, home, self, power, and agency, which can be helpful for the researchers to analyze and to understand the life and experiences of international students. Benefiting from the case of Iranian international students, I will argue how such understanding will help to promote a space in which international students feel safe and supported in their social and academic lives.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».