Stage specific vulnerability of the laboratory populations of Lipaphis erysimi (Kaltenbach) to some convential insecticides.

Insect susceptibility is inversely proportional to the physiological state of the tested individuals. The present study investigates the instar differences in insecticide receptiveness of Lipaphis ersimi (Kaltenbach) populations. The results indicate an increased vulnerability of latter instars as comparison to earlier ones. These results show the disagreement to past studies. The reasons for this vagueness are also explained. Introduction The mustard aphid, Lipaphis erysimi, is a major insect pest in Brassica crops across northern India and the adjoining states (Prasad, 1988; Singh & Sachan, 1995). Nymphs and adults principally feed on tender shoots, but they can also feed on other parts except old stems. Occasional feeding on older leaves was also noticed. The potential for a population of Lipaphis erysimi to build up in mustard may be greater that expected if crop behind schedule. The use of insecticides in management of Lipaphis elysimi could be an adequate measure to reduce the impacts of this insect. The purpose of our study was to determine the controlling potential of different conventional insecticides. Materials and Methods Bioassays were conducted with 1, 2, 3 and 4 instar nymphs of Lipaphis elysimi to determine whether or not the insect vulnerability to different insecticides varies with nymphal age. Lipaphis erysimi was reared using the technique described by Sumati (1985). Before experimentation, nymphs were maintained on fresh pod in an incubator at 22±1 C temperature, 60% r. h. and a photoperiod of 12L: 12D. first instars were used immediately after fresh laying. The bioassay procedure described below was the same for each instar tested. Stock solutions of insecticides were made by using micropipette. In the present bioassay, seven concentrations were tested, each concentration being 1: 1 0 of the preceding one (Bushvine, 1971), along with an untreated control. All solutions were made in doubled distilled water. The final solutions was then poured into 5 Petri-dishes (12.5×1.5 cm) corresponding to each concentration and control, with the help of atomizer. Once the solution was dried, 10 nymphs of Lipaphis erysimi was placed in each Petri-dish, which was closed with a lid. Insect were incubated at 22± 1 °c temperature, 60% r. h. and 12L: 120 photoperiod. Three bioassay replicates were made on 3 consecutive days and these tests were repeated over 5 populations. Larval mortality was evaluated after 72 hours. LC50 values were determined using pro bit analysis. During statistical analysis, one instar was considered as one treatment. Each treatment had three replications and LC50 data recorded above were subjected to complete randomized block design. Results The bioassay results demonstrate that all the insecticide under investigation was found toxic to Lipaphis erysimi. Nymphs that are died from the uptake of insecticides were degenerated with the time, and had not showed any activity on slight touch since two hours of their introduction into the contaminated Petri dishes. These observations were similar for each instar tested. In contrast, control nymph developed normally and exhibited low mortality rates (Table1). Discussion The LC50 values for each instar were consistent among different populations signifying that the population of Lipaphis erysimi was homogeneous in its response to different insecticides during the experimental period. Also, the dissimilarity in response of all larvar instars of Lipaphis erysimi to test insecticides under investigation, as revealed by LC50 values and slopes, demonstrated that larval age have strong influence on insect susceptibility. This is contrast with Beegle et al. (1981) and Trudel et al. (1997) who observed no significant differences between LC50 values for various instars of Trichoplusia ni (Hubner) and Dioryctria abietivorella (Grote), respectively. It is well documented in toxicological literature that insect susceptibility decreased (LC50 increased) in later stages of developments but in contrast to this, in the present investigation we found an increase in susceptibility. This exaggeration in defenselessness may be because of increase in possibility of exposure in later stage individuals that have an increase in movement and surface area exposed in later instars. Our experiment revealed the toxicity pattern at constant temperature, but field studies are necessary to validate these concluding bioassay results. PLANT PROTECTION: Pests 287 Conclusion The results indicated that an increased vulnerability of latter instars as comparison to earlier ones. These results show the disagreement to past studies. Table l: Toxicity of different insecticides to various life-stages of Lipapltis erysimi. Slope LC50 value mg [a.i.]/ liter Insecticide Life stage Number Mortality in control Mean Significance Mean Significance 1 Instar 210 0 0.588 CD 8.70 CD 2 Instar 210 0 0.589 0.264 6.88 I. ] 8 3 Instar 210 0 0.477 Sem 4.56 Sem Malathion 4 Instar 210 0 0.568 0.084 3.15 0.38 Adult (Apterae) 210 0 0.508 1.49 1 Instar 210 0 0.500 CD 8.33 CD 2 Instar 210 0 0.482 0.272 6.51 1.35 3 Instar 210 0 0.518 Sem 5.16 Sem Oichlorvos 4 Instar 210 0 0.610 0.865 4.21 0.43 Adult (Apterae) 210 0 0.573 1.50 Endosulfan 1 Instar 210 0 0.482 CD 48.90 CD 2 Instar 210 0 0.724 0.311 32.22 8.54 3 Instar 210 0 0.575 Sem 24.25 Sem 4 Instar 210 0 0.627 0.099 15.35 2.71 Adult (Apterae) 210 0 0.601 1 Instar 210 0 0.614 CD 7.34 CD 2 Instar 210 0 0.440 0.182 3.23 1.48 3 Instar 210 0 0.509 Sem 2.61 Sem Chlorpyriphos 4 Instar 210 0 0.487 0.058 1.87 0.47 Adult (Apterae) 210 0 0.530 1.54 LC50 values of the various insecticides are presented in Table 1. Highly significant difference was observed for LC50 values among different instars with same insecticide. There were no significant differences for slopes between different instars tested. References Beegle, C.C.; L.C. Lewis, R.E. Lynch, A.J. Martinez.1981. Interaction of larval age and antibiotics on susceptibility of three insect species to Bacillus thuringiensis. Journal of Invertibrate Pathology, 37:143-153. Busvine, J. R., 1971. A critical review of the techniques for testing insecticides: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, London. pp: 345. Prasad, S. K. 1988. Screening of germplasm of mustard (Brassica juncea) for resistance to Lipaphis erysimi (Kalt.). Indian J. Entomol. 48: 227-230. Singh, C. P., and G. C. Sachan.1995. Estimation of losses in yield of rapeseed, Brassica cmnpestris, by the mustard aphid, Lipaphis erysimi (Kalt.) in Tarai, India. Insect Sci. Applic. 16: 283-286. Sumati, 1985. Biology of Lipaphis erysimi (Kaltenbach) and field incidence of Athalia proxima Klug to effect of insecticides on germinations. Pantnagar, GBPUA T. 107p. Trudel, R.; E. Bauce, J. Cabana, C. Guertin.1997. Vulnerability of fir cone worm, Dioryctria abietivorella (Grote) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), in different larval stages to the HD-l strain of Bacillus thuringiensis. The Canadian Entomologist, 129: 197-198.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.