Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This dissertation consists of three independent essays addressing three separate health care policy issues.Essay 1, "Incentive Effects of Government Mandated Cost-Shifting," shows how mandated cost shifting, because it does not require resources to pass through the hands of government, can be an optimal form of income redistribution in providing health care to the poor of society when government is sufficiently costly.Under this system, the government mandates the proper treatment of illness regardless of ability to pay and enforces that mandate with investigation.The paper shows that under costly information on illness the physician cheats by providing the wrong treatment when treating a rich patient who has low severity illness and a poor patient who has high severity illness.In response the government also investigates the treatment of such patients.The paper also shows the conditions under which mandated cost shifting is less wastehl and beneficial to patients.Essay 2,"The Effects of the Relationship between Quantity and Quality of Care on Quality of Care," shows that the relationship between quality and quantity in the patient's utility as well as in the cost of care play an important role in determining the ability of a payment scheme to induce efficient quality and quantity of care.The payment schemes examined are fixed fee for service, prospective payment, and cost sharing.The paper shows that neither prospective payment nor fixed fee for service can be used to induce a first-best provision of quality and quantity.Cost sharing is the only scheme that can be used to induce the efficient supply of both quantity and quality.Essay 3, "The Effect of Hospital Downsizing in British Columbia on the Quality of Care for Maternity Patients" uses maternity data from the Canadian province of British Columbia to estimate the effect of the reduction in hospital utilization rates and the transfer of care from hospitals to communities and to patients7 homes on readmission rates.The results show that the policy reduced hospital length of stay and increased readmission rates for maternity patients.DEDICATION To Jesus Christ, my Love, who means more than this world to me.To my parents and Archbishop P. Sarpong, for continuing to believe in me.faithfulness.Starting with the members of my committee, I would like to acknowledge those who were God's instruments in making this thesis a reality.Gordon Myers has been the stronghold of this thesis.His encouragement has been invaluable.He valued the idea in the first essay and encouraged me to pursue it.Working with him has really deepened my understanding of economic theory and modelling.This deepened understanding is also partly due to Nicholas Schmitt, whose financial support and dedication to the second chapter made an impression on me.Jane Friesen also helped to improve my empirical skills.This is very much appreciated.I also would like to acknowledge the Knowledge
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,006 | 0,018 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,011 |
| Communication savante | 0,007 | 0,007 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,005 | 0,008 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,022 | 0,005 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».