MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2234869016

Fostering healthy communities @ Hair Care Centers.

2003· article· en· W2234869016 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Hendricks Cs

Notice bibliographique

RevuePubMed · 2003
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiqueSchool Health and Nursing Education
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHealth promotionCharterHealth carePolitical scienceInternational healthPoliticsEquity (law)Government (linguistics)Economic growthPublic relationsPublic administrationMedicine
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract: The author discusses the planning and development of a unique method of reaching African American clients by Chi Eta Phi Sorority, Inc. members in the state of South Carolina through use of beauty shops and barber shops, which is termed Hair Care Centers. Using bulletin boards which are placed in these establishments, the members of Chi Eta Phi Sorority, Inc. change the educational materials monthly based on the minority health awareness themes created by the Office of Minority Health in Washington, DC. The goal of Project F-HC is to take selfcare, health promoting, disease prevention information to places where persons frequent, making it easily accessible. Key Words: Healthy Communities; African American Health; Hair Care Centers he Healthy Communities Initiative evolved from the Healthy Cities Movement that began in 1984 in Canada and in 1986 the World Health Organization T (WHO) Regional Office for Europe initiated the WHO Healthy Cities Project. Today, the Healthy Cities Project is an international movement involving over a thousand cities. Initially, 11 cities were selected to participate in the project; however, the current phase includes 35 cities, 23 national networks and over 650 European cities (Flynn & Dennis, 1996). This international movement mobilizes local government, professionals, citizens and private and volunteer organizations to put health promotion on the city's political agenda with guiding principles of health for all (Primary Health Care, 1978; Ottawa Charter for Health Promotions, 1986). The principles include: equity, health promotion, community participation, multisectoral cooperation, appropriate technology, primary health care and international cooperation. Several communities in South Carolina are participating in the South Carolina Healthy Communities Initiative (Healthy Communities Initiative, 1996). In an effort to promote the concept of Healthy Communities, the South Carolina Nurses Foundation placed a call for proposals from nurses working with groups and agencies indicating how they could promote the concept of Healthy Communities in South Carolina. A collaborative proposal among the South Carolina Chapters of Chi Eta Phi Sorority, Inc. was submitted, Fostering Healthy Communities Hair Care Centers or Project F-HC. Description of Proposed Project Project F-HC (Fostering Healthy Communities Ca) Hair Care Centers) proposes to take health care education information to sites within communities most frequented by the citizenry across socioeconomic status. Beauty and barber shops (hereafter referred to as Hair Care Centers) are one of the community sites where persons tend to visit at least on a monthly basis. Many persons spend anywhere from one-half hour per visit to as much as four hours. Hair Care Centers (HCC) are probably visited more than any other community place excluding religious institutions and grocery stores. It is estimated that most HCCs have at least twenty persons come through their doors on a daily basis. The goal of Project F-HC is to take self-care, health promoting, disease prevention information to places where persons frequent making it easily accessible. Project F-HC is being implemented through the collaborative efforts of the South Carolina Chapters of Chi Eta Phi Nursing Sorority, Inc. The chapter members identified HCCs in their community that were willing to participate in the project. Bulletin boards are mounted in the HCCs that will be designated for use only by the project. Health information will be displayed on a monthly basis for the next twelve months. Health emphasis topics were selected using the monthly national health awareness themes as a guide and the aggregate needs (i.e., January is Glaucoma Awareness month, November is Diabetes month, etc.). All sites will follow the same information rotation; however, if an HCC expresses a specific request, every effort will be made to address the request. When considering HCCs as health information sites, space is always a concern. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,074
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,246

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0060,001
Communication savante0,0030,002
Science ouverte0,0010,009
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0740,011

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,194
Tête enseignante GPT0,428
Écart entre enseignants0,235 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2003
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePubMedMême sujetSchool Health and Nursing EducationTravaux en français237 207