MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2235762609

Servant Leadership Practices

2003· article· en· W2235762609 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lorraine Stramba

Notice bibliographique

RevueMichigan Community College journal · 2003
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiqueEmotional Intelligence and Performance
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésServant leadershipSociologyLeadershipCynicismPublic relationsMeaning (existential)Transactional leadershipPsychologyPolitical scienceLawPolitics
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

serrant leadership model, first proposed in the sixties and seventies by Robert Greenleaf, but with historical references to concepts dating back to ancient philosophy, appears to be the model of choice in the new millennium. purpose of this investigation is to examine the perceptions of servant leadership and job satisfaction in different staffing levels of large educational institution. Organizational Leadership Assessment was used to collect the data. results of the study demonstrate that those in all groups with strong perceptions of servant leadership express job satisfaction, although the senior leadership group demonstrates somewhat incongruous results. Possible sources of the discrepancy and potential explanations for findings are discussed, and recommendalions for further research are proposed. Introduction Although living in new millennium, educators are still governed for the most part by old notions and paradigms. Top-down, hierarchical leadership is relic from an industrial age when only managers thought and workers simply did: yet, it is still the norm today. Antiquated pedagogical theories of knowledge dissemination still prevail in many institutions of higher education, failing to celebrate and capitalize on human learning potential. Revolutionary scientific discoveries on brain function and the nature of change inform only few leaders and educators. Even language reflects outdated assumptions in American culture and entertainment. In order to negotiate this impasse, it is important to examine not only the meaning of work in society, but also to consider some leadership theories and their overt and subtle consequences. In time of enormous upheaval and challenge, technological skills and educational groundwork are briskly being eclipsed, employees of the new millennium have different expectations of the workplace than in previous eras, and the fervent search for meaning in one's life plays crucial role in the choices people make. In the information or knowledge age, job satisfaction will grow from paradoxical circumstances or concepts of interdependent opposites. Bennis (2000) describes change as burdensome and exhilarating. Plett (1997) calls servant leadership two equal concepts joined in paradox. McGee-Cooper and Trammell (2002) assert that the servant leadership model is ideally suited to illuminating paradox and creating workplace of vitality and transformation. Wheatley (1999) redefines change as natural process within the environments of living systems-bodies, minds and organizations. participants in the present study are employed at large community college in Toronto, one of the most cosmopolitan cities in the world. As well as being employees in new age, they are also educators and administrators. For growing number, success is no longer merely defined in terms of prestige and money, but rather in terms of the impact of work on family, society, and the environment (McGee-Cooper and Trammell, 2002). purpose of the study is to examine the perceptions of servant leadership and job satisfaction in large, metropolitan educational institution. Definition of terms Community Naylor, Willimon, and Osterberg (1996) define community as a partnership of free people committed to the care and nurturing of each other's mind, body, heart, and soul through participatory means. Leadership DePree (1989) defines leadership as follows: The first responsibility of leader is to define reality. last is to say thank you. In between the two, the leader must become servant and debtor (p. 11). Servant Leadership Servant leadership is an approach to leadership and service whereby the leader is servant first and leader second. Spears (1995) defines it as a long-term, transformational approach to life and work; in essence, way of being that has the potential to create positive change throughout our society (p. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,018
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,061

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0040,001
Communication savante0,0030,001
Science ouverte0,0010,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0180,005

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,352
Tête enseignante GPT0,407
Écart entre enseignants0,055 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations18
Publié2003
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueMichigan Community College journalMême sujetEmotional Intelligence and PerformanceTravaux en français237 207