Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
serrant leadership model, first proposed in the sixties and seventies by Robert Greenleaf, but with historical references to concepts dating back to ancient philosophy, appears to be the model of choice in the new millennium. purpose of this investigation is to examine the perceptions of servant leadership and job satisfaction in different staffing levels of large educational institution. Organizational Leadership Assessment was used to collect the data. results of the study demonstrate that those in all groups with strong perceptions of servant leadership express job satisfaction, although the senior leadership group demonstrates somewhat incongruous results. Possible sources of the discrepancy and potential explanations for findings are discussed, and recommendalions for further research are proposed. Introduction Although living in new millennium, educators are still governed for the most part by old notions and paradigms. Top-down, hierarchical leadership is relic from an industrial age when only managers thought and workers simply did: yet, it is still the norm today. Antiquated pedagogical theories of knowledge dissemination still prevail in many institutions of higher education, failing to celebrate and capitalize on human learning potential. Revolutionary scientific discoveries on brain function and the nature of change inform only few leaders and educators. Even language reflects outdated assumptions in American culture and entertainment. In order to negotiate this impasse, it is important to examine not only the meaning of work in society, but also to consider some leadership theories and their overt and subtle consequences. In time of enormous upheaval and challenge, technological skills and educational groundwork are briskly being eclipsed, employees of the new millennium have different expectations of the workplace than in previous eras, and the fervent search for meaning in one's life plays crucial role in the choices people make. In the information or knowledge age, job satisfaction will grow from paradoxical circumstances or concepts of interdependent opposites. Bennis (2000) describes change as burdensome and exhilarating. Plett (1997) calls servant leadership two equal concepts joined in paradox. McGee-Cooper and Trammell (2002) assert that the servant leadership model is ideally suited to illuminating paradox and creating workplace of vitality and transformation. Wheatley (1999) redefines change as natural process within the environments of living systems-bodies, minds and organizations. participants in the present study are employed at large community college in Toronto, one of the most cosmopolitan cities in the world. As well as being employees in new age, they are also educators and administrators. For growing number, success is no longer merely defined in terms of prestige and money, but rather in terms of the impact of work on family, society, and the environment (McGee-Cooper and Trammell, 2002). purpose of the study is to examine the perceptions of servant leadership and job satisfaction in large, metropolitan educational institution. Definition of terms Community Naylor, Willimon, and Osterberg (1996) define community as a partnership of free people committed to the care and nurturing of each other's mind, body, heart, and soul through participatory means. Leadership DePree (1989) defines leadership as follows: The first responsibility of leader is to define reality. last is to say thank you. In between the two, the leader must become servant and debtor (p. 11). Servant Leadership Servant leadership is an approach to leadership and service whereby the leader is servant first and leader second. Spears (1995) defines it as a long-term, transformational approach to life and work; in essence, way of being that has the potential to create positive change throughout our society (p. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle