MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2236150584 · doi:10.14264/106898

An evaluation of learning styles, learning issues and learning problems of Confucian heritage culture students studying hospitality and tourism management in Australia

2004· dissertation· en· W2236150584 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe University of Queensland · 2004
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiqueLearning Styles and Cognitive Differences
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHospitalityTourismHospitality management studiesStyle (visual arts)Focus groupHigher educationVariety (cybernetics)Learning stylesPolitical sciencePedagogyPublic relationsPsychologySociologyGeographyMarketingBusinessArchaeology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The education of international students is becoming increasingly important to the financial wellbeing of western universities in the major English speaking destination countries of Australia, New Zealand, Canada, the United Kingdom and the United States of America. The purpose of this research is to examine the learning style preferences and learning problems of Chinese and other Confucian heritage culture (CHC) students who undertake degree level education in hospitality management and/or hospitality and tourism management at university in Australia.  CHC students have been embarking on western education since the early 1800s and currently form the majority of the international student cohort studying at tertiary level in Australia. Additionally, the demand for western education by such students is forecast to increase. There have been a variety of studies undertaken that focus on the learning experiences, problems and issues of these students studying in western institutions. However, no such studies have been undertaken that focus on the learning style preferences and learning issues and problems of CHC students who are undertaking hospitality management and/or hospitality and tourism management at tertiary level in Australia. Consequently, this study concentrates on tertiary level hospitality management and/or hospitality and tourism management students and identifies their preferred learning style. Based on their preferred learning style, this study also examines learning issues and problems experienced by this group of students and makes recommendations regarding how CHC students' learning experiences in western universities can be made more successful. Thus the problem researched in this thesis is:  How can the learning experience of international Confucian heritage culture students who study hospitality management and/or hospitality and tourism management at tertiary level in Australia be improved?  This study gathered both quantitative and qualitative data from CHC students studying hospitality management and/or hospitality and tourism management at a selection of universities and other higher education institutions throughout Australia. CHC students' learning style preferences were identified by the use of the Learning Styles Questionnaire (Honey and Mumford, 1986) which was based on Kolb's (1984) Experiential Learning Theory. This questionnaire was administered to 514 international students, 260 of whom were identified as being of Confucian heritage culture. It was found that these students displayed a preference for a reflector learning style. Essentially, this means that these students prefer to take a more passive approach to learning and appreciate the opportunity to reflect on what has been learned. This finding was in direct contrast to the other international students who completed the Learning Styles Questionnaire who tended to display a more activist learning style preference.  Based on the Learning Styles Questionnaire results, four focus group interview sessions were conducted with CHC students studying hospitality management and/or hospitality and tourism management at one of the participating institutions. These focus groups were designed to complement the findings of the questionnaire and, based on students' preferred learning style, clearly identify learning issues and problems.  This study found that this group of CHC students had to make a significant adjustment to their approach to learning when coming to a western university. Specifically, it was found that students experience problems and issues with the requirement to more fully understand material being taught; the expected classroom behaviour; the different and unusual methods of assessment; the role of the lecturer; and the ubiquitous nature of group work and presentations. This study found that this group of CHC students experienced confusion and stress, particularly at the start of their program, and had to work extremely hard in order to successfully complete courses. It was found that this group of students were very versatile regarding their approach to study and were able to differ their study approaches to take into account the various course requirements.   The major contributions of this research are identified in Chapter 6. The results of this research have significant implications for higher education institutions in Australia who are keen to attract increasing numbers of international students onto their programs. The successful completion of a degree by a CHC student is but one measure of success and based on this study a variety of teaching and learning recommendations that higher education institutions might adopt are suggested in order to ensure that this group of students more fully benefit from their overall learning experience.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,116
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,033
Tête enseignante GPT0,336
Écart entre enseignants0,303 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle