MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2236306754

Living away from blessings: School failure as lived experience.

2012· article· en· W2236306754 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Amanda S. Duncan

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian Journal of Education / Revue canadienne de l éducation · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiqueEducational and Psychological Assessments
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDisappointmentPsychologyLived experienceSocial psychologyFace (sociological concept)PedagogyDevelopmental psychologySociologyPsychoanalysisSocial science
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Henriksson, Carina. (2008). Living away from blessings: School failure as lived experience. London, ON: Althouse Press. 164 pages, ISBN 978-0-920354-67-4 School failure is a beast that face on a day-to-day basis, with full knowledge of its encompassing impact on their lives. Carina Henriksson's Living Away from Blessings: School Failure as Lived Experience focuses on the factors that can lead to and perpetuate student failure in school systems. Henriksson uses student experiences to illustrate the raw social and environmental elements that can contribute to failure. Henriksson's research, conducted in Sweden, focused primarily on the lived experiences of former in an individualized program and adolescents enrolled in juvenile institutions. She also consulted teachers in the juvenile institutions to examine their practices outside of a classroom. These have faced social stigmatization and personal disappointment because of their educational situations. Failure can be caused by many different variables, but Henriksson's goal was not to diagnose or find its roots. Using students' own experiences, she was able to uncover common themes that seemed to contribute to failure. As the author states, students offer an understanding of school failure as lived experience in the classroom (p. 19). Students in individualized programs do not feel that their education prepares them for the national normal program, leading to a sense of hopelessness: The case study showed that out of 135 in three individual programs, only 23 percent had left school duly qualified for university studies, and 46 percent had chosen to leave school altogether. If 'okay' means that leave school fully qualified for higher education, then the programs were a failure. (p. 26) Henriksson demonstrates that most student failure she encountered was behaviourally based, not academically rooted. The uneven relationship of respect between student and teacher can lead these to feel alone and unworthy, especially in these individualized and institutionalized programs. Most in these programs, according to Henriksson, have not experienced love, trust and safety as children, which can subsequently lead them to distrust any form of educational authority. Teachers are often seen as enemies, especially when pick up on non-verbal cues and gestures more than they do the academic aspects of their schooling. Henriksson stressed that failure in the school system is often communication-based--often deriving from student-teacher relationships, not from lack of student knowledge itself. The failure felt by is increased by stigmas, labels and exclusion that society also pins on them. Teachers, according to Henriksson, must see every child individually and be continually conscious of the learning environment they create. She argues that teaching is a moral profession, meaning that teachers in these settings must create an atmosphere of trust and joyfulness to avert failure. Living Away from Blessings: School Failure as Lived Experience is unlike most education books; its primary focus is the students' experiences with failure, but not from a teacher's perspective. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,205
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0170,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,085
Tête enseignante GPT0,366
Écart entre enseignants0,281 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations7
Publié2012
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian Journal of Education / Revue canadienne de l éducationMême sujetEducational and Psychological AssessmentsTravaux en français237 207