MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W223753194

The Program Director and Crisis Management

2010· article· en· W223753194 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Leigh W. Cellucci, Linda C. Hatzenbuehler, Brian D. Crawford, Carla Wiggins, Tracy J. Farnsworth

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of critical incidents · 2010
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueRadiology practices and education
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPhoneNewspaperAttendanceRevenueWork (physics)ScheduleOptometryPolitical scienceMedicineBusinessAdvertisingEconomicsManagementFinanceEngineering
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Enrique Mendez, Program Director of Western University's Optometry Program (WUOP) was reviewing the irregular salaries line of the budget/expense report he had received from Kelly Kennedy, an optician in his department. Part of Kennedy's job description was to reconcile the monthly expense account of the program with the established budget for the fiscal year. Kennedy had noticed discrepancies regarding irregular salaries, a term for over-time expense for optical clinic staff. In the irregular salaries line, Kennedy noted that the expenses incurred for over-time work had increased significantly during the last six months. This was odd as the optometry students were on a semester schedule and there had not been any special circumstances that would warrant the over-time work. Rather, there should have been a consistent amount expensed for over-time reported. Nonetheless, Kennedy showed Mendez that approximately 80 percent of the budget allocated for irregular salaries had been expensed, with 75 percent of the budget year expensed. How should Mendez handle this situation? located about 25 miles south of Charlotte, NC. Local media was prompt in arriving on the scene, and the story was already popping up on local news websites. La Barrie's phone began ringing nonstop with requests for interviews from wire services, newspapers, and radio and television stations throughout the country, even some international media outlets. Western University Optometry Program The Western University Optometry Program (WUOP) was a collaborative relationship between the State of Idaho and Lewiston University School of Optometry, Nebraska. Each year, WUOP enrolled eight Idahoan residents for course-work at Western University, which was equivalent to that received by first year students at Lewiston. These eight students then transferred to Lewiston for their remaining three years of optometry school. The State of Idaho provided a scholarship for each student of approximately 50% of Lewiston's tuition each of the four years. The administration of WUOP was controlled in Idaho and Mendez and Jewel Rasconski (the administrative assistant) were responsible for the academic management for both programs, employee relations, operating expenses and payroll for each program as well as the materials and supplies for the WUOP. Kelly Kennedy, an optician in the department served as a clinician and held additional administrative responsibilities. She was responsible for reconciling the monthly expense account of the program with the established budget for the fiscal year regarding clinical operations. Rasconski's job duties consisted of gathering program data, reconciling departmental and program accounts, arranging schedules, preparing documents and reports and acting as a liaison with other University departments. She was personable and social. Almost all of the students, faculty members, and practitioners liked Rasconski. She was well respected and she presented as capable, efficient, and knowledgeable. Program data were ready, available, and accurate to pertinent parties. Work schedules reflected optician and student preferences. Other administrative assistants from different departments at the university knew if they called Rasconski, they would get a quick response, good follow through, and they could share a laugh and have a nice conversation with her. Leave that task to me! She was known to state. I can take care of that for you. The program director relied upon Rasconski's excellent work efforts and frequently praised her as a valuable employee to the program. When Mendez joined the Optometry Department two years ago, his predecessor also noted that Rasconski was an excellent staff member. You can use her knowledge and experience to keep this department running well. With our unique arrangement with Lewiston, we are lucky to have someone as personable and capable as Rasconski. Rely upon her for success. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,606
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,140

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,014
Tête enseignante GPT0,412
Écart entre enseignants0,398 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2010
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of critical incidentsMême sujetRadiology practices and educationTravaux en français237 207