MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2239264667 · doi:10.1353/cwe.2015.0065

Gateway to Freedom: The Hidden History of the Underground Railroad by Eric Foner (review)

2015· article· en· W2239264667 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Matthew Salafia

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Journal of the Civil War Era · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBusiness, Management and Accounting
ThématiqueAmerican History and Culture
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésUnderground RailroadGateway (web page)ContextualizationMythologyHistoryEngineeringLawComputer sciencePolitical scienceClassics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Gateway to Freedom: The Hidden History of the Underground Railroad by Eric Foner Matthew Salafia (bio) Gateway to Freedom: The Hidden History of the Underground Railroad. By Eric Foner. (New York: W. W. Norton, 2015. Pp. 320. Cloth, $26.95.) After languishing for years following Larry Gara’s critical denunciation, the Underground Railroad has received a bit more scholarly attention in [End Page 583] recent years. Eric Foner’s Gateway to Freedom: The Hidden History of the Underground Railroad has made it official: the Underground Railroad is safe to study again. Foner successfully elides the mythology surrounding the Underground Railroad through careful contextualization. Although Foner claims that the book is “a study of fugitive slaves and the underground railroad in New York City,” it is much more (7). Rather than an elaborate system filled with codes, hidden tunnels, and secret messages, Foner’s Underground Railroad is an “interlocking series of local networks, each of whose fortunes rose and fell over time, but which together helped a substantial number of fugitives reach safety in the free states and Canada” (15). Foner’s deep contextualization and the breadth of his narrative offer two primary contributions. First, he relies on the accounts of operatives to explain how the Underground Railroad actually functioned. Using these sources, Foner explains in detail how enslaved African Americans escaped, and how northerners aided them. Thus he reveals how the Underground Railroad developed over time and increased in complexity in response to the tumult of the 1850s. Second, Foner situates the Underground Railroad within a broad historical context. The development of the abolition movement, for example, and the divisions within it, affected the development of the Underground Railroad. And, in helping fugitives to escape, Underground Railroad operatives contributed to the escalation of sectional tension that led to the Civil War. The book begins with Foner’s description of the process of emancipation that created a free black population in New York City. This new free black population quickly created an urban infrastructure that increased the chances for enslaved African Americans to escape successfully. Whereas Foner reminds readers that “as long as slavery has existed, slaves have escaped to freedom,” he shows that the Underground Railroad began with the interracial abolition movement in the 1830s (30). In response to the related issues of fugitive slaves and the kidnapping of free African Americans, in 1835 New Yorkers created the New York Committee of Vigilance, which was dedicated to protecting free African Americans through the court system and to aiding fugitives arriving in the city. Within the committee, there were divisions between those who called for direct action and those who preferred to focus on racial uplift. The first leader of the Committee of Vigilance, David Ruggles, favored direct action, but some leaders of the African American community believed that direct action, often in the form of mob violence, violated calls for racial uplift. In the 1840s the Underground Railroad became a “patchwork system” that “depended for its effectiveness on political and personal networks” (101). [End Page 584] And whereas infighting continued, and the New York abolitionists sometimes worked at cross-purposes with William Lloyd Garrison’s American Anti-Slavery Society, as Foner puts it, “Aiding fugitives was an activity in which warring abolitionists could and did cooperate” (98). The 1850 Fugitive Slave Law created a “crisis” in the free black community, but it was this period, the 1850s, that marked the Underground Railroad’s “heyday” (151). The measures of the new law made black freedom in the northern states perilous, and so abolitionists began sending more fugitives to Canada, intensifying their operations to meet the emergency rather than succumbing to the law’s threat to prosecute those who helped fugitives escape. In the 1850s, local networks of operatives extended along the East Coast connecting major metropolises to upstate New York and to Canada. In his most intriguing chapter, Foner introduces readers to Sydney Howard Gay, an operative who kept detailed records on more than two hundred fugitives who passed through his office between 1855 and 1856. Gay recorded the motivations of fugitive slaves, their origins, and their methods of escape. Thus we learn that most fugitives were young, and...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,718
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,366

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0020,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,022
Tête enseignante GPT0,203
Écart entre enseignants0,181 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Journal of the Civil War EraMême sujetAmerican History and CultureTravaux en français237 207