Gateway to Freedom: The Hidden History of the Underground Railroad by Eric Foner (review)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: Gateway to Freedom: The Hidden History of the Underground Railroad by Eric Foner Matthew Salafia (bio) Gateway to Freedom: The Hidden History of the Underground Railroad. By Eric Foner. (New York: W. W. Norton, 2015. Pp. 320. Cloth, $26.95.) After languishing for years following Larry Gara’s critical denunciation, the Underground Railroad has received a bit more scholarly attention in [End Page 583] recent years. Eric Foner’s Gateway to Freedom: The Hidden History of the Underground Railroad has made it official: the Underground Railroad is safe to study again. Foner successfully elides the mythology surrounding the Underground Railroad through careful contextualization. Although Foner claims that the book is “a study of fugitive slaves and the underground railroad in New York City,” it is much more (7). Rather than an elaborate system filled with codes, hidden tunnels, and secret messages, Foner’s Underground Railroad is an “interlocking series of local networks, each of whose fortunes rose and fell over time, but which together helped a substantial number of fugitives reach safety in the free states and Canada” (15). Foner’s deep contextualization and the breadth of his narrative offer two primary contributions. First, he relies on the accounts of operatives to explain how the Underground Railroad actually functioned. Using these sources, Foner explains in detail how enslaved African Americans escaped, and how northerners aided them. Thus he reveals how the Underground Railroad developed over time and increased in complexity in response to the tumult of the 1850s. Second, Foner situates the Underground Railroad within a broad historical context. The development of the abolition movement, for example, and the divisions within it, affected the development of the Underground Railroad. And, in helping fugitives to escape, Underground Railroad operatives contributed to the escalation of sectional tension that led to the Civil War. The book begins with Foner’s description of the process of emancipation that created a free black population in New York City. This new free black population quickly created an urban infrastructure that increased the chances for enslaved African Americans to escape successfully. Whereas Foner reminds readers that “as long as slavery has existed, slaves have escaped to freedom,” he shows that the Underground Railroad began with the interracial abolition movement in the 1830s (30). In response to the related issues of fugitive slaves and the kidnapping of free African Americans, in 1835 New Yorkers created the New York Committee of Vigilance, which was dedicated to protecting free African Americans through the court system and to aiding fugitives arriving in the city. Within the committee, there were divisions between those who called for direct action and those who preferred to focus on racial uplift. The first leader of the Committee of Vigilance, David Ruggles, favored direct action, but some leaders of the African American community believed that direct action, often in the form of mob violence, violated calls for racial uplift. In the 1840s the Underground Railroad became a “patchwork system” that “depended for its effectiveness on political and personal networks” (101). [End Page 584] And whereas infighting continued, and the New York abolitionists sometimes worked at cross-purposes with William Lloyd Garrison’s American Anti-Slavery Society, as Foner puts it, “Aiding fugitives was an activity in which warring abolitionists could and did cooperate” (98). The 1850 Fugitive Slave Law created a “crisis” in the free black community, but it was this period, the 1850s, that marked the Underground Railroad’s “heyday” (151). The measures of the new law made black freedom in the northern states perilous, and so abolitionists began sending more fugitives to Canada, intensifying their operations to meet the emergency rather than succumbing to the law’s threat to prosecute those who helped fugitives escape. In the 1850s, local networks of operatives extended along the East Coast connecting major metropolises to upstate New York and to Canada. In his most intriguing chapter, Foner introduces readers to Sydney Howard Gay, an operative who kept detailed records on more than two hundred fugitives who passed through his office between 1855 and 1856. Gay recorded the motivations of fugitive slaves, their origins, and their methods of escape. Thus we learn that most fugitives were young, and...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».