MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2240689260 · doi:10.1111/bjh.13848

<scp>ROR</scp>1‐based immunomagnetic protocol allows efficient separation of <scp>CLL</scp> and healthy B cells

2015· letter· en· W2240689260 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jana Kotašková, Šárka Pavlová, Igor Greif, Olga Stehlíková, Karla Plevová, Pavlína Janovská, Yvona Brychtová, Michael Doubek, Šárka Pospı́šilová, Vı́tězslav Bryja

Notice bibliographique

RevueBritish Journal of Haematology · 2015
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesAgentura Pro Zdravotnický Výzkum České Republiky
Mots-clésImmunomagnetic separationProtocol (science)MedicineChemistryChromatographyPathology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) is the most common leukaemia among adults in the Western world. This lymphoproliferative disorder is defined by the presence of at least 5 × 106 clonal lymphocytes/ml peripheral blood (Hallek, 2015). The biggest clinical challenge is the fact that CLL eradication by any available therapy, apart from allogeneic stem cell transplantation, fails to cure the disease, inducing only temporary disease remission, i.e., when the disease does not manifest clinically but CLL cells still persist in the body. During this phase a population of CLL cells often slowly re-expands to trigger CLL relapse. The relapse is often based on the poorly understood but clinically important process of therapy-driven selection of more aggressive CLL subclones (Malcikova et al, 2015). There is a growing requirement to physically separate CLL cells from other cell types for both experimental and possible future clinical applications. Positive and negative separation methods, mainly immunomagnetic cell sorting and rosette-forming-based techniques, of the whole B cell population have found a widespread use in routine clinical diagnostics and experimental CLL research (Essakali et al, 2008). These approaches are suitable for samples with high lymphocytosis where CLL cells outnumber healthy B cells but fail to distinguish malignant cells from healthy B cells. Therefore, the isolation and subsequent analysis of CLL cells from patients in disease remission remain limited, mainly due to the fact that healthy B cells can be present in comparable or even higher numbers than malignant cells. Another option for CLL cell separation is fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS). However, basic selection using CD19 and CD5 is not efficient because of the variability in CD5 expression among CLL patients (including atypical CLL, lacking CD5) and the presence of CD19 and CD5 on a subpopulation of healthy B cells (Seifert et al, 2012). After therapy, clinicians take advantage of co-staining with additional markers to detect minimal residual disease (MRD) in CLL patients by following a standardized protocol (Rawstron et al, 2013). This multiparametric flow cytometric analysis is based on the screening of CD3, CD5, CD19, CD20, CD22, CD43, CD38, CD45, CD79b, and CD81 (Rawstron et al, 2013; Stehlíková et al, 2014). Apart from MRD monitoring, the Rawstron protocol can be used for FACS separation of residual malignant cells in disease remission. The main limitation of FACS is the need for advanced equipment in specialized flow cytometric facilities to implement multicolour panel cell sorting. To overcome this limitation we tested a methodology to separate residual CLL cells using a surface receptor ROR1 (Receptor Tyrosine Kinase-Like Orphan Receptor-1) as a target for immunomagnetic separation. ROR1 is a unique marker of CLL cells with negligible expression on other peripheral blood cells. ROR1 has been shown to be uniformly expressed on the surface of CLL cells; moreover, its level is not affected by treatment (Baskar et al, 2008; Daneshmanesh et al, 2008; Kaucká et al, 2011). First, we tested and compared ROR1-based positive separation [Anti-ROR1 MicroBead Kit; Whole Blood Anti-ROR1 MicroBead Kit (both Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany)] with negative, non-B cell depletion-based approaches [RosetteSep™ Human B Cell Enrichment Cocktail (Stem Cell Technologies, Vancouver, Canada); B Cell Isolation Kit II (Miltenyi Biotec); B-CLL Cell Isolation Kit (Miltenyi Biotec); MACSxpress B-CLL cell Isolation Kit (Miltenyi Biotec)] (see details in Fig 1A). All of the anti-ROR1 kits contained monoclonal anti-ROR1 (clone 2A2) antibody, which was reported to induce no apparent toxicity (Baskar et al, 2012), a conclusion supported also by our analyses (data not shown). Blood samples from 10 CLL patients in complete remission were separated in parallel using positive and negative separation protocols. The separated cells from individual fractions were analysed using a 7-colour modified Rawstron protocol (see details in Fig 2). We focused on the quantification of T cells, non-CLL B cells and CLL cells. The obtained data (Fig 1) clearly demonstrated that positive ROR1-based MACS isolation of CLL cells was superior to non-B cell depletion protocols in the samples with low CLL counts. The better efficiency is mainly due to elimination of non-CLL B cells, which are the major contaminant in all four negative separation strategies tested. In particular, the Whole Blood Anti-ROR1 MicroBead Kit can be highly recommended as it enables isolation of CLL cells directly from the whole blood without prior mononuclear cells separation and producing samples with more than 90% CLL cells in a protocol that takes approximately 35 min (compared to 75–120 min in other combinations). Secondly, we took advantage of ROR1 expression on CLL cells and tested two immunomagnetic isolation set-ups for the separation of healthy and malignant B cells (schematized in Fig 2A): (i) the depletion of non-B cells (negative separation) was combined with subsequent ROR1-positive separation (Fig 2A, black arrows), and (ii) direct ROR1-based positive separation was followed by negative depletion of non-B cells (Fig 2A, dashed arrows). In principle, both approaches allow isolation of both CLL and non-CLL B cells from a single patient. As shown in the example of patient in complete remission (Fig. 2C, D), the first two-step separation protocol (negative B cell separation with B Cell Isolation Kit II, followed by ROR1-positive separation with Anti-ROR1 MicroBead Kit) produced pure populations of CLL and non-CLL B cells (Fig 2C, D). Interestingly, the separation efficiency of healthy non-CLL B cells was higher with the second method, when ROR1-positive CLL cells were first removed by anti-ROR1 MACS and the mixture of non-CLL B cells with other cell types was subjected to non-B cell depletion (Fig 2B). This approach would be useful in applications that require back-to-back comparison of healthy and malignant CLL cells from the same patient. In summary, we provide evidence that ROR1-based separation is capable of distinguishing and separating CLL cells from healthy B cells even in patients with low lymphocytosis, e.g. in patients diagnosed in early stage and after treatment and in individuals with monoclonal B lymphocytosis. This methodology represents a unique tool for analysis of CLL progression after treatment and for understanding of the molecular mechanisms driving disease relapse. Supported by a grant from the AZV CR, Ministry of Health, Czech Republic, NR 15-29793A. JK, SPav, PJ and VB were involved in experiment design, data acquisition, data interpretation and manuscript writing. OS designed flow cytometric analysis. IG performed separations. KP, YB, MD and SPos were involved in data analysis and manuscript corrections. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. The authors have no competing interests.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Intégrité de la recherche
Catégories consensuellesIntégrité de la recherche
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,652
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0030,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,024
Tête enseignante GPT0,326
Écart entre enseignants0,302 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations7
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBritish Journal of HaematologyMême sujetChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ResearchTravaux en français237 207