Exercise in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Compliance and population characteristics of patients referred to the McGill Cancer Nutrition-Rehabilitation Program (CNRP)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
8631 Background: Few studies focus on exercise in advanced NSCLC. We evaluated compliance with exercise prescription in stages 3/4 NSCLC. Methods: Patients (pts) referred to the CNRP, a multidisciplinary clinic, for weight/functional loss were evaluated for participation in a supervised exercise program. Compliance with exercise was scored as 0 (refused/home exercise), 1 (<6 sessions in 2 mo), and 2 (≥ 6 sessions in 2 mo). Gender, age, PS, stage, CRP, weight loss, and quality of life [Edmonton Syptom Assessment Scale (ESAS)] were assessed by univariate and multivariate analyses. Survival from the time of exercise prescription was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Results: 168 pts were referred to the CNRP from April 2002 to September 2005. 92/168 (54%) were prescribed exercise. Of the 76 remaining pts, 3 (4%) refused, and 6 (8%) were on an exercise trial. Others were excluded due to bone metastasis/severe pain (50 pts, 66%), cardiovascular instability (13 pts, 17%) or poor PS (4 pts, 5%). Of the 92 who were prescribed exercise, the compliance score was 0 in 38 (41%), 1 in 37 (40%) and 2 in 17(19%). There were no significant differences in gender, age, PS, stage, ESAS, and weight loss at the time of referral among the three compliance groups. Most pts (15/17) with a compliance score of 2 were referred prior to or during initial treatment, whereas those with compliance scores of 0 and 1 were referred later in the course of treatment. Compliance with exercise correlated with survival (p<0.001). The median survival from time of exercise prescription for pts with a compliance score of 2 was 22 mo (95%CI 13.4,30.2); compared with 5 mo (95%CI 3.7,5.6) and 7 mo (95%CI 2.5,11.5) for those with compliance scores of 0 and 1 respectively. No serious adverse events occurred. Conclusion: A select group of advanced NSCLC pts can exercise safely at a moderate-high level. Those referred earlier tended to be more compliant, and their longer survival may reflect a lead time bias. Clinical trials are needed to evaluate efficacy of exercise in newly diagnosed NSCLC. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».