Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Social networking is a causative factor for obesity in several ways: 1) Obesity is frowned upon socially. Social rejection and isolation produces sadness and depression, which elicits "comfort eating", typically involving highly pleasurable food. The pleasure and distraction of eating eases emotional pain and depression -a form of self-medication. Some obese people even proclaim, "food is my best friend," thus replacing their social networking. This may become a vicious cycle with more weight gain, more rejection, more comfort eating, even lower self-esteem and more isolation, and so on. 2) The brain is averse to emotional pain and undergoes changes to keep the comfort eating behavior going. The person may thus develop a dependence on the pleasure of comforting foods -an actual addiction -which neuromaging data is now confirming. 3 ) Social rejection and isolation of the obese person lowers self-esteem, which tends to result in the person not caring about gaining more weight, another vicious cycle. 4) Fear of social criticism in obese people induces shame and embarrassment. They may thus keep weight issues a complete secret and may be too embarrassed to seek help, a third vicious cycle, plus additional comfort eating to cope with the shame. Social networking can likewise combat obesity in several ways: 1) Social support reverses isolation, sadness, and comfort eating; support groups have been long known to enhance weight loss efforts, e.g. Overeaters Anonymous (OA). 2) Social networking enhances self-esteem, especially when the obese person experiences success at losing weight and becomes a mentor to those just starting out. Being a mentor is a win-win situation, as this also reinforces the mentor's life changes. The goal of food addiction support groups, like OA, is to become a mentor. 3) Social networking offers accountability pledging self-actions to a group takes advantage of peer pressure. 4) A weight loss "buddy" is very desirable to obese individuals, and offers accountability, mutual problem solving and resisting cravings and binges. 5) Online social networking is a new tool, consisting of bulletin boards, chat rooms, success stories, weight loss buddies, and tips. Online social networking can offer the advantage of anonymity, which avoids shame and embarrassment. Non-anonymous online social networking, e.g. Facebook, is less useful. Facebook, as the name implies, is based on face photos , to which obese people are averse, and 93% of Facebook "friends" know each other in real life. Social networks can facilitate breaking the addiction (problem food) cause of obesity. Group support helps the obese person tolerate withdrawal from problem foods and adds motivation to keep going. Re-addiction is prevented by socially learning to cope with life without turning to food.Online social networking will be demonstrated via a website used by thousands of overweight kids. A smartphone app obesity intervention will also be demonstrated, based on the addiction model, which uses extensive online social networking (buddies, groups, and mentors).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,012 | 0,037 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle