Shared Experiences: interactions of aboriginal peoples and the ‘outsiders’
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This volume of Aboriginal History presents a diverse group of papers concerned with historical and political issues and experiences of aboriginal peoples in their interactions with the 'outsiders', the adventurers, government officers, traders and settlers who came uninvited into their countries from foreign lands.They focus not only on indigenous Australians but also on indigenous minorities in New Zealand, Canada, the United States of America and Norway.While some papers deliberately use comparative approaches in their discussion others concentrate on only one of these regional settings, leaving the reader to draw out some of the similarities and differences for him or herself.The lengthy gestation of this collection reflects the complexities of bringing together papers from such a diverse range of authors, some of whom responded to initial calls for papers and others of whom fortuitously happened to submit papers which coincided with this theme.I hope that the final collection is not only of interest but also generates further inquiries which may lead to more discussion on these topics in future.Common themes highlighted in this collection of papers include the early contact experiences of indigenous groups with explorers, traders and others; the process and effects of land alienation, land rights recognition and negotiations; the impact of assimilationist policies; and the realities of contemporary indigenous international networks. Early contact experiencesTwo papers -Baker and Scott -use very different types of information to describe early contact experiences.Baker, using Thomas Mitchell's journals of his travels in Australia and Lewis and Clark's accounts of their journeys in North America, presents the explorers' perspective and speculates on the similarities and differences between these frontier experiences.An interesting contrast was the close interaction between the American explorers and the Indian peoples whom they encountered, demonstrated by the explorers' willingness to live off local natural resources and mix with their 'hosts'; and the deliberate distancing of Mitchell and his party from such contact, an approach which made their survival in the 'bush' much more precarious.On the other hand both Mitchell and Lewis and Clark stress the common assumption on the part of the Indian and Aboriginal groups whom they met that the strangers were 'spirits'.Scott, using Cree narrative histories and mythologies, confirms the persistence of such beliefs and speculates on the importance of reciprocal behaviours in enabling relatively peaceful contact with the 'whiteman'. Land Alienation, Land Rights Recognition and NegotiationCraufurd-Lewis' overview of the development of treaties in Australia, New Zealand, Canada and the United States of America explores contrasts in the perceptions of the value Elspeth Young, a geographer and currently Director, Graduate Studies in Environmental Management and Development at the Australian National University, has worked with Aboriginal groups in central and northern Australia and has conducted comparative research with indigenous peoples in northern Canada, Alaska and Botswana.Her main research interests include contemporary indigenous land management and appropriate planning for indigenous community development.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,013 | 0,013 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,042 | 0,038 |
| Communication savante | 0,015 | 0,008 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,016 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,004 | 0,007 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».