MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2244002062

Investigating Stress, Psychological Well-Being, Mental Health Functioning, and Self-Regulation Capacity among University Undergraduate Students: Is This Population Optimally Functioning?/Une Etude Des Niveaux De Stress, Bien-Etre Psychologique, Sante Mentale, et Capacite D'auto-Regulation Chez Les Etudiants Universitaires De Premier Cycle : Cette Population Fonctionne-T-Elle De Facon Optimale?

2015· article· fr· W2244002062 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Natalie Durand‐Bush, Kylie McNeill, Matthew Harding, Johanna Dobransky

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy · 2015
Typearticle
Languefr
DomainePsychology
ThématiqueResilience and Mental Health
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMental healthPsychologyPsychosocialPopulationFeelingCoping (psychology)Well-beingDistressPsychological interventionClinical psychologySocial psychologyPsychotherapistMedicinePsychiatry
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The mental health and well-being of Canadian undergraduate university students is growing concern as research indicates that 30% of them are highly distressed, with Ontario students reporting the highest levels (Adlaf, Demers, & Gliksman, 2005). More worrisome still, university students' levels of distress are reportedly twice as high as those of their nonstudent peers. The front cover of the September 10, 2012, issue of Macleans magazine drew attention to the mental health crisis across Canadian university campuses. The report revealed that a shocking number of Canadian students feel depressed, even suicidal and referred to the student body as broken generation (Lunau, 2012). Furthermore, some studies suggest that university students do not possess adequate coping skills to deal with the adversity inherent in postsecondary education (Rawson, Bloomer, & Kendall, 2001). Self-regulation-a skill that helps individuals to proactively plan, control, evaluate, and adapt their thoughts, feelings, and actions in order to achieve their goals in their changing environment (Zimmerman, 2000)-can lead to increased well-being (Hofer, Busch, & Kartner, 2011) and adjustment (Park, Edmondson, & Lee, 2012) in students, and thus offers an important avenue for research and counselling with this population. The purpose of this research was to assess the levels of stress, psychological well-being, mental health functioning, and self-regulation capacity of two different samples of university undergraduate students. Another aim was to determine if self-regulation capacity could significantly predict students' levels of stress, psychological well-being, and mental health functioning and, accordingly, make recommendations for counselling practice.StressFrom psychosocial perspective, results from one's perception of imbal- ance between one's demands and resources, or from pressure that exceeds one's perceived ability to cope (Lazarus & Folkman, 1984). Persistent that is not resolved through coping or adaptation leads to distress, which may translate into anxiety, pain, physical suffering, and withdrawal (Selye, 1975). It is alarming that data from 16,123 Ontario university students participating in the Spring 2013 American College Health Association-National College Health Assessment (ACHA-NCHA) survey indicate that mental distress is significant concern for university students. Specifically, 51% of students reported feeling hopeless, 40% reported feeling so depressed they were not able to function, and 11% seriously considered suicide in the 12 months prior to the questionnaire (ACHA, 2013).According to national mental health surveys conducted with Canadian under- graduate students in 1998 (Adlaf, Gliksman, Demers, & Newton-Taylor, 2001) and 2004 (Adlaf et ah, 2005), approximately one third of students faced elevated psychological distress, with women reporting higher levels than men in the latter study. These findings are consistent with results of another study indicating that although female undergraduate students had more effective time management behaviours, they reported higher levels of academic and anxiety and benefited less from leisure activities than their male counterparts (Misra & McKean, 2000). Interestingly, Adlaf and colleagues' (2001) study indicated that distress declined as students progressed through their program of study. However, this finding was not replicated with the 2004 student sample (Adlaf et ah, 2005). This decline in was also found by Misra and McKean (2000), as well as Rawson et al. (2001), who reported that sophomore students had higher mean levels of than juniors within their college student population. Rawson and colleagues suggested that sophomores' levels may be high because students in this cohort not yet developed the coping mechanisms used by older students to deal with college stress (pp. 326-327). Recently, it was highlighted in the Ontario Undergraduate Student Alliance (OUSA) report that while 37% of Ontario undergraduate students have utilized mental health services by their fourth year of study, roughly three out of four students did so in their first year, suggesting that the initial transition to university may be challenging time for students (Pin & Martin, 2012). …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,029
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,059

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0020,001
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,021
Tête enseignante GPT0,309
Écart entre enseignants0,288 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations6
Publié2015
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian Journal of Counselling and PsychotherapyMême sujetResilience and Mental HealthTravaux en français237 207