MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W224433201

Protecting the Flame Behind a Chain-Link Fence

2010· article· en· W224433201 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Amanda N. Schweinbenz

Notice bibliographique

RevueProceedings: International Symposium for Olympic Research · 2010
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueSport and Mega-Event Impacts
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCeremonyHistoryBannerLawPolitical scienceMedia studiesSociologyArchaeology
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

When you are lucky enough to be inside the Olympic bubble, the Games can often seem about finding the best hockey tickets, getting into the cool parties to hang with the athletes and celebs or just getting a chance to watch your friends break their personal records for ingesting champagne and beer over 17 days. (2) Introduction On February 12, 2010, her Excellency the Right Honourable Michaelle Jean, the Governor General of Canada, officially opened the XXI Olympic Winter Games in Vancouver, British Columbia. Millions of Canadians tuned-in to watch the elaborate ceremony and to see Canadian athletic heroes light the Olympic cauldron. After months of speculation and rumours, it was Canadian hockey legend Wayne Gretzky who ignited the flame that would burn throughout the seventeen-day sporting extravaganza. Thousands lined the rain-slicked streets, cheering as Gretzky travelled via pick-up truck from BC Place to the water's edge of Coal Harbour to the Olympic cauldron. The rain had not dampened the spirits of Olympic supporters as they relished in the glow of the flame that had been ignited in Olympia, Greece over one hundred days earlier. Yet the following morning, Olympic tourists and Canadian citizens awoke to a surprising development. Overnight, a chain-link fence with a banner had been erected around the Olympic cauldron. Vancouver Organizing Committee for the Olympic Games (VANOC) officials claimed that they needed to protect the structure from potential vandals. Despite the fact that VANOC officials had long argued that the flame, which had travelled across the entire nation, symbolized peace and unity, the flame was now inaccessible to the general population. One spectator argued, It's horrible that local people paid for the Olympics but can't approach the (3) Yet not everyone was prevented from experiencing the flame without an obstruction before them. Members of the Olympic Family and accredited media personnel freely roamed within the barrier. They, unlike the rest of the general population were not considered a 'threat' to the sacred flame. Yet for everyone else in Vancouver, this fence represented more than the protection of the flame from those who would do it harm; it symbolized that not everyone is welcome within the inner sanctums of the Olympic Movement. Olympic Symbolism The modern Olympic Games have been built on a foundation of (4) From its inception in 1894 at the Sorbonne Conference in Paris, symbols were interconnected to the Games to make connections to the past that would trigger a sense of nostalgia, importance, and history. It was not by chance that Baron Pierre de Coubertin chose to play the Olympic Hymn during the conference; he knew the importance of creating and utilizing symbols to foster human experiences. So deep was his belief in the importance of symbols, that in 1924, the Baron criticized the organizer of the 1920 Games in Antwerp, Belgium because of its lack of powerful symbolism. (5) Throughout history, the gatekeepers and architects of the Olympic Movement have cultivated symbols that evoke intense meanings to people throughout the world. The most recognizable of these symbols includes the Olympic rings, medal ceremonies (including the playing of national anthems), and the Olympic flame. As Blumer has suggested, humans act towards things on the basis of the meanings that these things have for them. (6) People's social interactions related to these and other Olympic symbols have helped to foster their passionate feelings about the Olympic Games. These feelings are further intensified by the marketing tools of the IOC, local organizing committees, sponsors, and the media. The Olympic flame has come to be one of the strongest symbols that people relate to within the Olympic Movement, and VANOC readily used the flame to connect with Canadian citizens. The Olympic Flame The Olympic flame has become one of the central symbols associated with the Olympic Games: Of all the ceremonial rites surrounding an Olympic festival, the lighting of the sacred flame that consecrates all the events that will unfold over the following two weeks is perhaps the epitome. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,010
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,954
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0100,005
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,083
Tête enseignante GPT0,428
Écart entre enseignants0,345 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2010
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueProceedings: International Symposium for Olympic ResearchMême sujetSport and Mega-Event ImpactsTravaux en français237 207