MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2244737621 · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.4885

Regulation of the polo kinase during cytokinesis

2015· editorial· en· W2244737621 sur OpenAlexaff
David Kachaner

Notice bibliographique

RevueOncotarget · 2015
Typeeditorial
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueMicrotubule and mitosis dynamics
Établissements canadiensUniversité de MontréalInstitute for Research in Immunology and Cancer
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCytokinesisPolo-like kinaseKinaseMedicineCell biologyBiologyCell cycleGeneticsApoptosisCellCell division

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Mitosis and cytokinesis allow faithful distribution of the duplicated genetic material from one mother to two daughter cells. These cell cycle events are regulated precisely by several kinase families including Cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs), Aurora kinases and Polo-like kinases (Plks). Interestingly, these proteins are able to collaborate with each other during cell division and defects in their regulations could lead to aneuploidy. Discovered in Drosophila and conserved from yeast to humans, the Polo kinase has emerged as a potent regulator of cell division [1]. The Polo kinase is the founding member of the Plk family [2]. While budding yeast and fission yeast each have a single Plk (Cdc5 and Plo1 respectively), mammals have five Plk members (Plk1-5). Apart from Polo, the fly has only one additional member named Sak, which is orthologous to Plk4 and appears dedicated to the regulation of centriole duplication. The fly Polo kinase, the single yeast Plks and human Plk1 all promote similar functions during cell division, including mitotic entry, centrosome maturation, spindle assembly, kinetochore function and cytokinesis. Plks share a conserved amino-terminal Ser/Thr kinase domain (KD) and a carboxy-terminal Polo-Box Domain (PBD) [3]. The PBD acts as a phosphopeptide-binding domain and allows Polo to bind substrates and adaptor proteins that recruit Polo to its subcellular locations including centrosomes, kinetochores and the central spindle during mitosis and the midbody during cytokinesis. The multiple functions of the Polo kinase are possible because this protein is submitted to a complex regulation. Amongst other modes of regulation, Plks are activated by phosphorylation of their activation loop in the KD [2]. In humans, this activation of Plk1 begins in G2 and is mediated by the Aurora A kinase, whereas in flies the activation of Polo in early mitosis on kinetochores requires its phosphorylation by Aurora B, a subunit of the Chromosomal Passenger Complex. The activity of Polo has long been known to be essential for cytokinesis [4]. However, how Polo is regulated in this process was unknown. In a recent paper from our laboratory, we have investigated this question in Drosophila cells in culture. We found that Polo phosphorylation by Aurora B is required for successful cytokinesis [5]. This phosphorylation occurs in the activation loop of the KD at Thr182. Our results indicate that upon phosphorylation, Polo dissociates from (or is prevented from binding to) the PBD-bound Map205, a microtubule-associated protein which sequesters unphosphorylated Polo on microtubules and inhibits its kinase activity [6] (Figure ​(Figure1).1). Then, freed from this inhibitor, activated Polo is recruited to the midbody. To determine the physiological importance of Polo phosphorylation during cytokinesis, we performed time-lapse microscopy in cells where Aurora B is inhibited or when endogenous Polo was replaced with a nonphosphorylatable form (Polo T182A) fused to the GFP. In both cases, Polo failed to localize properly to the midbody and more than 80% of the cells attempting division failed cytokinesis and became binucleated. Figure 1 Model for the regulation of Drosophila Polo during cytokinesis Our findings can be interpreted in structural terms in the light of the recent publication by Xu et al. which solved the cocrystal structure of a fragment of Drosophila Map205 in complex with the separate PBD and KD of zebrafish Plk1 [7]. This work reveals that Map205 binds and stabilizes the closed conformation of the PBD, which in turn binds and stabilizes the inactive conformation of the KD. Our findings now suggest that during cytokinesis, phosphorylation on the Polo kinase at its activation-loop negatively regulates the interaction between Polo and its PBD-bound inhibitor Map205 by an interdomain allosteric mechanism and induces a conformational change that is required for full activation of the kinase. Drosophila Map205 is poorly conserved in vertebrates, but the observation that human Plk1 is competent for an inhibiting interaction with Map205 suggests that there may exist other physiological interactors of Plk1 that regulate it by a similar mechanism. Such proteins remain to be identified.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,002
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,007

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,004
Tête enseignante GPT0,229
Écart entre enseignants0,224 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueOncotargetMême sujetMicrotubule and mitosis dynamicsTravaux en français237 207