MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2246742031 · doi:10.1155/2002/673126

Fever and a Rat Bite

2002· article· en· W2246742031 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Christopher M. Booth, Kevin Katz, James Brunton

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology · 2002
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineImmunology and Microbiology
ThématiqueRabies epidemiology and control
Établissements canadiensUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineDermatology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

269 A70-year-old previously healthy man presented to the emergency department with a three-day history of fever. Two weeks before, while working in the kitchen of his restaurant, he captured a rat. The rat bit him on his right thumb, prompting the man to kill the rat and dispose of it in the garbage. He saw his family physician, who gave him a topical antibiotic ointment and a tetanus booster. The wound healed and the patient felt well until 10 days later when he developed fever, chills and sweats. At the same time, his thumb became painful, swollen and erythematous. The wound dehisced spontaneously. He returned to his family physician, who prescribed oral cloxacillin and referred him to the emergency department. Upon arrival at the emergency department, his temperature was 39.1°C and his oxygen saturation was 90% on room air. Blood and wound swab cultures were obtained. The patient was given a second tetanus booster and a consultation with the infectious diseases service was requested. The patient was from China and had lived in Canada since 1996. He had not travelled outside Canada since his arrival. His vaccination history was unknown. There was no history of arthralgias, myalgias or rash. On physical examination by the infectious disease service, his blood pressure was 110/80 mmHg, his heart rate was 70 beats/min and regular, and his temperature was 36.7°C. His oxygen saturation was 97% on room air. There was no cervical adenopathy and his conjunctiva were normal. His neck was supple. Cardiovascular and abdominal examinations were normal. Auscultation of his chest revealed bibasilar inspiratory crackles. There was no rash, petechiae, jaundice or clubbing. His right thumb was swollen and erythematous to the base. There was a superficial puncture wound on the ventromedial aspect of his thumb (Figure 1). There was no drainage. His thumb was tender and indurated. There was also evidence of lymphangitis on the dorsal aspect of his right forearm. Initial laboratory investigations revealed a white blood cell count of 9.5×109/L, and normal electrolyte, renal and liver profiles. Two sets of blood cultures were negative. A Gram stain of the sample from the wound showed Gramnegative bacilli on microscopy, but the culture was negative. Radiographs of his chest and hand were normal. What is your diagnosis and how would you treat this patient?

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,718
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,998

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,005
Tête enseignante GPT0,198
Écart entre enseignants0,193 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations6
Publié2002
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical MicrobiologyMême sujetRabies epidemiology and controlTravaux en français237 207