MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2247128303

An evidence-based approach to an evaluation of a health promoting schools intervention

2003· dissertation· en· W2247128303 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Marita Lynagh

Notice bibliographique

RevueFigshare · 2003
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueHermeneutics and Narrative Identity
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésIntervention (counseling)MedicinePsychologyNursing
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

It is now widely accepted that schools are ideal settings for health promotion initiatives which target health and health risk behaviour of school-aged children. The current approach to school-based health promotion, known as the Health Promoting Schools (HPS) approach, embraces the principles of the Ottawa Charter and focuses on opportunities for action on: the formal school curriculum; the school environment (or informal curriculum); and links with the home and wider community. Acceptance and endorsement of the approach has come from several leading international and Australian health promotion organisations. Despite the large amount of interest and enthusiasm generated, there remain a number of significant gaps in knowledge and research evidence, particularly that which addresses the efficacy and effectiveness of the HPS approach. The recent drive by influential bodies for evidence-based heath promotion further supports the need for the application of a systematic framework to the development and evaluation of HPS interventions. This thesis, therefore, describes the application of the Staged Approach to health promotion practice and research model to the development and evaluation of a HPS intervention program which aims to reduce three priority health risk behaviours (smoking, unsafe alcohol use and inadequate sun protection) among a cohort sample of Australian adolescents. Chapter One of this thesis provides the background to the development of the HPS approach, identifies the key gaps in knowledge and research evidence, and outlines the stages of the Staged Approach model and its application to the development and evaluation of a HPS intervention. Chapter Two describes an audit of published literature over an 18-year period to provide an overall picture of the quantity of available evidence within each of the stages of health promotion practice. Chapter Three first identifies health issues which are appropriate to target in school-based health promotion, then applies Stages I and II of the Staged Approach by reviewing the available evidence on adequacy of measures and current prevalence, determinants and target groups. The design, methods and development of a measurement tool for a descriptive, baseline study on the prevalence and determinants of three health risk behaviours among young adolescents in the Hunter Region is outlined in Chapter Four, with the findings from this study described in Chapter Five. A critical review of school-based programs and HPS trials implemented to date is described in Chapter Six, as the first step in evaluating the efficacy and acceptability of interventions (Stage Ill of the Staged Approach). The review considers the extent to which the HPS approach has been conducted in trials, as well as issues regarding study design, outcomes and quality of available research. Chapter Seven describes a randomised controlled trial of a HPS intervention program which aimed to reduce the prevalence of three health risk behaviours among young adolescents in the Hunter region. The model of implementation and specific strategies are outlined, as well as the acceptability and degree of implementation as a process evaluation of the program. Chapter Eight reports on the impact/outcome evaluation of the program concerning its effectiveness in reducing the prevalence of three health risk behaviours and their determinants. Finally, Chapter Nine draws conclusions regarding the effectiveness of the HPS approach, provides recommendations for the implementation of future school-based health promotion initiatives and addresses issues of dissemination and wider adoption of HPS programs as indicated by the final stages of the Staged Approach model.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Autre devis · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,480
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,929

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0720,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,282
Tête enseignante GPT0,397
Écart entre enseignants0,115 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeAutre devis
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2003
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueFigshareMême sujetHermeneutics and Narrative IdentityTravaux en français237 207