Interest-Rate Swaps: Hedge or Bet? A Case of Canadian Universities
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
A swap agreement is a financial arrangement wherein two counterparties agree to exchange cash flows over a period on a pre-arranged basis. In an interest rate swap the exchange is between interest cash flows based on a fixed rate and those that are determined based on a variable rate. Thus one party will agree to pay a fixed interest rate on a notional principal for a certain period in exchange for receiving interest cash flows based on a variable interest rate set periodically. The variable interest rate is determined with reference to an agreed upon index. Typically the variable rates will be a certain percentage above the interbank lending rates such as LIBOR. In the international context interest rate swaps are often a combination of interest rate and currency swaps. In a currency and interest rate swap fixed interest cash flows on a nominal principal denominated in one currency will be exchanged for floating rate interest cash flows in another currency. In this paper our focus is on interest rate swaps in a domestic context only. Interest rate swaps are increasingly being used as a risk management tool. If a firm borrows on a variable interest rate it is exposed to the risk of changing interest rates in the future. To mitigate this risk the firm may enter into a swap contract wherein it will pay fixed interest on a notional principal to the swap dealer and, in turn, receive variable interest cash flows from the dealer. This effectively protects the firm from changing interest rates. When the variable interest declines the firm’s cash outflow of interest on the borrowing will be less and so will be the receipts from the swap dealer. When the variable interest goes up the increased borrowing cost will be offset by the increased receipts from the swap dealer. Though it is possible to manage the interest rate risk through other exchange traded derivatives like interest futures and options, an interest rate swap has the advantage of customization. The disadvantage is that, unlike exchange traded futures or options, terminating a swap may not be a simple process and can be costly. Although long common in the corporate sector, the use of interest rate swaps among non-financial public institutions, including universities, has increased in the past decade. Given the nature of cash flows and short term assets that are typically carried by universities it is not clear whether interest rate swaps are true hedges or un-hedge an existing natural hedge and create risk. Recently, for example, Harvard University lost US $345.3 million in terminating its interest-rate swaps. It is the purpose of this paper to study the use of interest-rate swaps in a sample of Canadian universities and investigate whether they are true hedges or actually increase a university’s financial risk. An attempt will be made using management control, organizational design concepts, and accounting theory to explain the prevalence of interest rate swaps among Canadian universities.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».