Building a case for self-regulating as a socially constructed phenomenon
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This dissertation extends work of contemporary psychologists, such as Bruner and Cole, who are struggling to investigate cognition and learning from socio-cultural perspectives. The field of cognitive psychology does not have a strong line of theories or methodologies that explain social processes and cognition in relation to each other. For the most part, cognitive psychologists have attempted to explain human thought and action in ontological isolation from the context and culture within which they occur (Martin & Sugarman, 1996). I agree with Martin and Sugarman's position that socio-cultural theory affords opportunities to develop a psychology of human learning that accounts for the emergent nature of memory and imagination as conscious practices of the agentic mind which are dynamically and reflexively1 shaped by experiences in socio-cultural settings. Throughout this dissertation I examine how self-regulating and social processes co-evolve in the context of a computer-supported learning environment. Forty-one first year undergraduate students participated in First Class Client computer conferences in groups of four throughout a semester-long course. The on-line “space” was used for discussing issues, completing and submitting assignments, and receiving instructor feedback. The design of this computer-supported learning environment was grounded in theories of self-regulating (Winne & Hadwin, 1998) and the notion that social and situational factors contribute to “in the head” cognition (Salomon, 1993). Within this course, technology played an integral role in both the teaching and learning processes. It also provided the primary means of data collection for this dissertation by capturing all discussions and assignments on-line. Throughout this dissertation, I focus on a set of strategic learning assignments that were completed individually by 41 students and submitted to on-line conferencing groups of four students. I examined processes and outcomes of self-regulating in this learning context using three contrasting theoretical lenses and grain sizes of analysis: individual constructivist, social constructionist, and symbolic interactionist. Through this multi-methodological examination of self-regulating, I illustrate a means for developing more sophisticated understandings of classroom orchestration and empirical examination of self-regulating as a reflexive and situated social process. 1Throughout the dissertation I use the term reflexive to mean reciprocal influence. That is, the individual is shaped by and in turn shapes the socio-cultural sphere.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,010 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle