Liminality and Change in an Atlantic Borderland: Notre Dame Bay, Newfoundland in the Eighteenth Century
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Notre Dame Bay in northern Newfoundland was an effective cultural, economic and environmental borderland. The Bay was the core homeland of the Beothuk Natives. They practiced a cyclical economic and spiritual life system that revolved around the seasonal movement of salmon stocks and seal and caribou herds. The Beothuk ranged far offshore to harvest birds on outlying islands, and they wintered in the interior at Red Indian Lake. The Notre Dame Bay zone was distinct, climatically and in other ways, from the rest of Newfoundland. The ecoregion of the Bay is the warmest and driest in Newfoundland, for example. The French had exploited the Bay from the earliest years of their long distance North American fishery, and the English began moving north from their base along the long-settled English Shore in the early 1700s. These first English visitors were looking for furbearers to trap, since the Beothuk had chosen not to trade with any Europeans. The floral and faunal biomass of the region made economic settlement viable. Two rivers, Newfoundland’s largest, provided a navigable corridor to the interior with its temperate continental climate, as the Beothuk had long known. The English began to settle in the harbours and coves of the Bay and ultimately squeezed out the commuting French. Deprived of access to the coast and its spiritual and economic resources, the Beothuk retreated to the interior and were extinct by the late 1820s. In recent years, the borderlands perspective has emerged as one way to frame historical questions emerging from an increased interest in transregional themes such as the Atlantic world. Borderlands were zones where newcomers of various ethnic and traditions competed with Natives to form transitory, liminal regions of community formation and cultural metissage. The borderlands perspective as I employ it also privileges the environmental determinants of settlement by both indigenous and European migrants. Borderlands often unfolded in discrete bioregions such as islands, mountain ranges, or river valleys…all ecologically-bounded zones where the experiences of both Natives and newcomers played out in dynamic conversation with nature. Ultimately, borderlands were events, temporary middle-places of imperial rivalry and socio-economic innovation occasioned by the interaction of climate, geography, biota, indigenous human residents, and incoming settlers. As events, borderlands have definable starting and ending points. This chapter will assess the efficacy of the borderlands perspective in generating a synthesized discussion of a specific Atlantic Canadian bioregion. This analytical vehicle can allow for previously unseen contours of interdependent social, economic and ecological change to be exposed. Are ecologically bounded zones of human competition over resources and land/waterscapes a valid unit of analysis for framing transregional historical questions? Additionally, species depletion, human migration, fire, and climate variability are examples of historical events that have modern parallels. Borderland studies can provide public historians with rich material for cultural programming. This is vital in the modern world, were legacy borderland communities are often located in rural and economically challenged areas. The borderlands approach to history can provide modern economic planners with actionable, ethical alternatives for regional development and rural renewal.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,010 | 0,005 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».