Epidemiology Of Post-Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorders Following Solid Organ Transplant In a Major Canadian Transplant Centre
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a consequence of organ transplantation with a high risk of mortality. We analyzed records of all patients who received a solid organ transplant at the University of Alberta between 1984 and 2011 (n=4525). 133 patients developed PTLD over the follow up period of January 1984 to November 2012, including 61 cases that occurred less than 2 years after transplant ( early), 33 cases between 2 and 7 years after transplant (late), and 39 cases more than 7 years after transplant (very late). We calculated the cumulative incidence rate for PTLD. We also used Cox regression analysis to determine whether variables year of transplant, age at transplant, organ, and EBV serology mismatch influenced the risk of development of any PTLD, early and very late PTLD, and central nervous system (CNS) PTLD (any PTLD and early PTLD shown in Table 1). The cumulative incidence of any PTLD occurrence was 1.4% at 1 year, 2.6% at 5 years, 4.3% at 10 years, 6.6% at 15 years, and 7.9% at 20 years. Univariate analyses showed that year of transplant (1984-92 vs. 1993-2001 vs. 2002-2011) was not predictive of PTLD development (p=0.27, HR 0.88, CI 0.68-1.12). Patients aged 0-5 years at transplant had significantly higher risk of PTLD development (mean freedom from disease (FFD) 18.90 yrs, 95% CI 17.52-20.28) followed by patients over 60 (mean FFD 25.49 yrs, 95% CI 24.97-26.0; p value 0.000, hazard ratio (HR) 0.57, 95% CI 0.49-0.68). Among organs transplanted, multivisceral transplant conferred the highest risk (mean FFD 5.94, 95% CI 4.19-7.69, n=12) followed by lung transplant (mean FFD 15.45 yrs, 95% CI 17.76-19.83), whereas kidney transplant conferred the lowest risk (mean FFD 27.52 yrs, 95% CI 27.15-27.88; p=0.000, HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.49-0.68). Patients with EBV serology recipient to donor mismatch (ie. recipient negative, donor positive) also had a higher risk of PTLD development (mean FFD 22.9 yrs, 95% CI 21.2-24.6 vs. mean FFD 27.2 yrs, 95% CI 26.90-27.54, p=0.000, HR 8.79, 95% CI 5.83-13.24). Variables associated with increased risk of early PTLD development were year of transplant, with the highest risk in patients transplanted between 1984-1991 (mean FFD 27.88 yrs, 95% CI 27.51-28.24) and the lowest risk in those transplanted in 2002-2011 (mean FFD 10.7 yrs, 95% CI 10.69-10.79, p=0.002, HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.49-0.94); age, with the highest risk in patients 0-5 yrs (mean FFD 20.66, 95% CI 19.68-21.63), followed by over 60 yrs (mean FFD 26.17 yrs, 95% CI 25.98-26.36, p=0.000, HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.45-0.68); organ, with the highest risk in lung transplant (mean FFD 16.50 yrs, 95% CI 16.21-16.80), and the lowest risk in kidney transplant (mean FFD 28.40 yrs, 95% CI 28.30-28.96; p=0.000, HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.46-0.74), and EBV serologic mismatch (p=0.000, HR 18.62, 95% CI 10.45-33.20). In contrast, only organ significantly predicted development of late PTLD, with lung conferring the highest risk (mean FFD 16.27 yrs, 95% CI 15.6-16.94; p= 0.002, HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.39-0.73). Risk of development of CNS PTLD (n=10, either primary or secondary) was greater in patients with EBV serology mismatch (p=0.000, HR 19.95, CI 4.98-79.92), but no other variables significantly predicted its development. In conclusion, the risk of PTLD after solid organ transplant is increased even 20 years after transplant, but the risk of early PTLD is declining over time. The risk of PTLD is highest in patients 0-5 years of age at transplant, patients receiving lung transplant, and patients with EBV serologic mismatch.Total n (%)PTLD Cases (n=133) (%)p valueHazard ratio95% CIEARLY PTLD Cases (n=61) (%)p valueHazard ratio95% CIYear of transplant0.270.880.68-1.120.020.680.49-0.941984-92655 (14.5)33 (24.8)14 (23.0)1993-20011558 (34.4)55 (41.3)24 (39.3)2002-20112312 (51.1)45 (33.8)23 (37.7)Age category0.0000.6450.55-0.750.0000.550.45-0.680-5231 (5.1)23 (17.3)13 (21.3)5-18225 (5.0)9 (6.8)7 (11.5)18-603242 (71.6)31 (23.3)34 (55.7)Over 60827 (18.3)16 (12.0)7 (11.5)Organ0.0000.570.49-0.680.0000.580.46-0.74Heart701 (15.5)35 (26.3)17 (26.9)Lung(18 Heart/Lung)512 (11.3)28 (21.0)16 (26.2)Kidney1983 (43.8)41 (30.8)12 (19.7)Liver1219 (26.9)28 (21.0)16 (26.2)Multivisceral (6 small bowel)12 (0.3)1 (0.75)0Pancreas98 (2.2)00EBV Serology Mismatch0.0008.795.83-13.240.00018.6210.45-33.20No3832 (84.7)75 (56.3)23 (37.7)Yes231 (5.1)33 (24.8)23 (37.7)Unknown460 (10.2)25 (18.8)15 (24.6) Disclosures: Peters: Lundbeck Canada: Honoraria; Hoffman LaRoche: Research Funding.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».