MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2254160762 · doi:10.2118/179133-ms

Improving Understanding of Complex Fracture Geometry of the Canadian Horn River Shale Gas Using Unconventional Fracture Propagation Model in Multi-Staged Horizontal Wells

2016· article· en· W2254160762 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Claudio Virués, Iheanyichukwu Ehiriudu

Notice bibliographique

RevueSPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference · 2016
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Établissements canadiensSchlumberger (Canada)Nexen (Canada)
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHydraulic fracturingFracture (geology)GeologyPetroleum engineeringUnconventional oilTight gasOil shaleMining engineeringGeotechnical engineering

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Hydraulic fracturing has become an important component of well completion in unconventional reservoir development and contributes to over 37% of the overall well construction spend. It has also, been seen as the most significant contributor to return on investment in unconventional reservoir exploitation. Until recently, field operation has been based on "trial and error" approach while modeling has been based hitherto on software used basically for the conventional reservoir fracture simulation. Hydraulic fracturing in shale gas reservoirs has often resulted in complex fracture network, as evidenced by microseismic monitoring. The nature and degree of fracture complexity must be clearly understood to optimize stimulation design and field development planning; completion strategy and operations planning. Unfortunately, the existing planar fracture models used in the industry today are not able to simulate complex fracture networks. A recently developed unconventional complex fracture propagation model (UFM) is able to simulate complex fracture network propagation in a formation with pre-existing natural fractures. Multiple fracture branches can propagate simultaneously and intersect, dilate or cross each other. This paper presents an integrated approach to optimize hydraulic fracture design by fully integrating all the data captured in the Canadian Horn River Shale. Based upon insight from the study, which was initiated by the operator and supported by the service provider, the operator could now make more informed design decisions and understand the interaction between the shale, the hydraulic and pre-existing natural fracture network, and reduce costs. The data incorporated into the study from both vertical and horizontal wells included geophysical, geological, petrophysical and geomechanical data integrated into a 3D earth model. Engineering data such as DFIT (measurement made from small volume of water pumped into target formation) derived fracture closure pressure, production and pressure data from the horizontal well in the pad were used for calibration and constraining of the model. A generation of 2D natural fracture network is also included in the paper by defining natural fracture parameters such as length, orientation, spacing, friction coefficient, cohesion, and toughness which are almost entirely validated using lab data and geomechanical interpretation. The complex hydraulic fracture simulation results calibrated with microseismic and fracturing treatment data were incorporated into numerical simulator and further calibrated with current production history of the candidate wells. The results of the hydraulic fracture, natural fracture and reservoir models were utilized to understand the fracture propagation mechanism in the Canadian Horn River shale gas formation. The prediction of the model (rates, cumulative and pressure) matched very rapidly and more closely with the observed production from the candidate well, improving confidence on the methodology utilized and results obtained. As a result of the project, the team is now able to run different hydraulic fracture design scenarios including stress shadow between stages validated using microseismic, stress shadow between offset wells, tuning factors not only on the geomechanics side but also in the treatment schedule and assess the impact that each key design parameter has over the candidate well's long term production using a numerical simulator with a unique gridding process. The result of the study also opened up new way of estimating the drainage area over a period of time and could be used when considering well spacing, placement and density during the field development planning. Based on these findings, the operator now have an insightful tool that could be used as the building block for future optimization of the fracture design.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Simulation ou modélisation · Signal consensuel: Simulation ou modélisation
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,653
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,690

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,038
Tête enseignante GPT0,239
Écart entre enseignants0,201 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSimulation ou modélisation
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations6
Publié2016
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueSPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology ConferenceMême sujetHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir AnalysisTravaux en français237 207