MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2254518144 · doi:10.4271/2007-01-3091

Circulation of Water in Addition to CO<sub>2</sub>, O<sub>2</sub> and Plant Biomass in an Artificial Ecosystem Comprised of Humans, Goats and Crops During Three 2-Weeks Closed Habitation Experiments Using CEEF

2007· article· en· W2254518144 sur OpenAlexaff
Yasuhiro Tako, Osamu Komatsubara, Shouichi Tsuga, Ryuji Arai, Kenji Koyamã, Shuji Fukuda, Makoto Akaishi, Masato Ogasawara

Notice bibliographique

RevueSAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series · 2007
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineChemical Engineering
ThématiqueOdor and Emission Control Technologies
Établissements canadiensOptech (Canada)
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBiomass (ecology)EcosystemEnvironmental scienceWater circulationAgronomyEnvironmental engineeringEcologyBiologyOceanographyGeology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

<div class="htmlview paragraph">The Closed Ecology Experiment Facilities (CEEF) were installed to collect data for realistic estimation of radiocarbon transfer in the ecosystem. Two-week experiments were conducted three times from September to November of 2006, in which two human subjects called as eco-nauts were enclosed and worked in an airtight facility, the CEEF. The eco-nauts were changed after a week from beginning of each experiment. In these experiments, a Plant Module (PM) with 23 crops, including rice, soybean, peanut, and sugar beet, was connected to an Animal & Habitation Module (AHM) which included the eco-nauts and two goats. 91.8-94.6% (by weight) of the food consumed by the eco-nauts and 79% of the feed to the goats (straw, leaf and bran of rice, leaf and stem of soybean, and leaf, stem and shell of peanut) were produced from crops in the PM. Amount of oxygen produced by the crops was more than the amount consumed by respiration of human and animals in these experiments. The oxygen added to the atmosphere of the PM by photosynthesis of crops was separated and supplied to the atmosphere of the AHM. Increased carbon dioxide in the AHM atmosphere by respiration of eco-nauts and goats was separated and supplied back to atmosphere of the PM. Almost carbon in the waste was withdrawn and not recycled in these experiments. Therefore, extra carbon dioxide was added to the PM atmosphere in order to compensate for the demand from photosynthesis of the crops. In addition to carbon dioxide, oxygen and plant biomass, water was also circulated in the CEEF in 2006, for the first time. Average water amounts of input to and output from the PM were 2090 L d<sup>−1</sup> and 2080 L d<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. The difference between them was less than 0.5% of the input, and was comparable to the amount of water with harvested crops. Average amount of water of input to and output from the AHM were 75.2 L d<sup>−1</sup> and 68.2 L d<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. Urine of the eco-nauts (1.7 L d<sup>−1</sup>) was withdrawn. Considerable water might be withdrawn as steam by pyrolysis of feces and urine of goats. These may account for the difference between the input and the output of water for the AHM. In the 2005 experiment, 46500 L of waste nutrient solution was withdrawn for 27 weeks of a whole growing period including 10 weeks of harvesting period. In the 2006 experiment, only 500 L of that was withdrawn during 38 weeks including 18 weeks of harvesting period. However, harvested edible biomass of almost crops in 2006 was less than that in 2005. It is considered that usage of newly made nutrient solution only during seedling growth period could improve final biomass production considerably.</div>

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Intégrité de la recherche
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,547
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,021
Tête enseignante GPT0,258
Écart entre enseignants0,237 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations10
Publié2007
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueSAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper seriesMême sujetOdor and Emission Control TechnologiesTravaux en français237 207