Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction: The 70’s have seen the generalization of the concept of electrochemical intercalation, leading in principle to immortal electrodes. The lithium-ion battery had later an early demonstration [1], but gained acceptance after the dangerous failures of lithium–metal batteries using liquid electrolytes had become a liability. The shortcomings of the Li-ion are, in terms of energy density, the weight devoted to the negative electrode is accentuated by the necessity of a copper current collector.. Two strategies are presently followed: i) the use of high voltage positives (LiNi0.5Mn1.5O2, “lithium-rich”) though no electrolyte seems still satisfactory to span a 5 V stability window especially at T > 40°C; ii) the re-emergence of the Li° electrode. I The 70’s saw also the emergence of the polymer electrolytes, after Wright [2] found appreciable conductivity in PEO-NaI adducts, conditional to heating to ≥ 60°C. After the polyethers complexing ability was extended to lithium salts, the field became very active and showing much ingenuity. However the main effort towards scaling-up to practical batteries was sustained by Hydro-Québec from 1978 to 2000 totalling close to one billion $. Polymer electrolytes: The carbon-carbon-oxygen sequence in polyethers corresponds to the optimal spacing to allow wrapping of the backbone around the cations. However, in practice, even the first homologue, with a CH3 (PO) side group introduces already some steric hindrance with much decreased cation sheathing ability. Defects like PO units or keeping through the design of the polymer architecture a Mw of the sequential PEO segments < 600 resolve the problem of crystallinity of the homopolymer and its stoichiometric complexes. The inclusion of nanoparticles (SiO2, Al2O3, BaTiO3…) increases the amorphous domains and had been widely used to create polymer electrolyte from commercial PEO without resorting to complex macromolecular synthesis. The next problem is the exponential decrease of the conductivity starting from the glass transition temperature, which it has not been possible to bring lower than ≈ -60 °C, resulting in practice to an operating temperature close to + 60 °C. The only practical way to lower Tg, i.e. reduce the volumetric density of chemical bonds is to add plasticizers, including ionic liquids, the drawback being then the risk of chemical cross-talk between the electrodes, as in liquid electrolytes. The callenge of breaking the Tg barrier in a mostly organic based matrix, has yet to be solved. Though, the Li° batteries operating with polymer electrolytes are relatively long-lived with minor dendrite problems. There is now an emphasis on unipolar conductivity polymers, to totally suppress the source of dendrites, the salt depletion at the Li° electrode during charging. This is obtained by including the anion is a backbone, either copolymerized [3] or separated [4] from the solvating chain. Another options are the surface coating of nano-particles with the salt [5] or in block polymers [6]. There is now convincing evidence that the lithium-metal electrode can function safely, the only restriction being the acceptability, for polymer electrolytes, of a “warm” battery (EVs, busses). References [1] Lazzari, M & Scrosati B, J. Electrochem. Soc, 127, 773, (1980). [2] Wright P.V. Br. Polym. J.,7,319-327 (1975). [3] Feng et al., Electrochimica Acta, 93, 254-263, (2013) [4] Meziane et al. Electrochimica Acta, 57, 14-19, (2011). [5] Villaluenga et al.,J. Mater. Chem. A, 1, 8348, (2013). [6] Bouchet et al., Nature Materials 12, 452–457 (2013)
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,006 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,148 | 0,082 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».