Serum insulin-like growth factor (IGF) and IGF-binding protein levels and risk of lung cancer: a case-control study nested in the beta-Carotene and Retinol Efficacy Trial Cohort.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Recent prospective studies have suggested that insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I levels are related to risk of some epithelial cancers. We previously reported in a case-control study a significant association between IGF-I level and lung cancer risk, with a 2-fold increased risk in the highest quartile. We now report the results of a lung cancer case-control study nested in the placebo arm of the beta-Carotene and Retinol Efficacy Trial in heavy smokers. We identified 159 cases for whom sera had been collected at least 3 years before diagnosis and for whom 2 suitable controls/case (final number, 297) could be matched from the same study arm on age (within 5-year intervals), sex, ethnicity, year of enrollment into the beta-Carotene and Retinol Efficacy Trial, year of blood draw, and exposure category (smoking or asbestos). The cases were significantly heavier smokers than the controls (mean pack-years, 58.7 and 45.9, respectively; P < 0.001). An inverse relationship between IGF-I level and age was evident only for former smokers, and not for those who were current smokers at the time of blood draw. Both IGF-I and IGF-binding protein (IGFBP)-3 levels were higher in cases than in controls, but none of the differences achieved statistical significance. The odds ratios for IGF-I were around unity, except for subsets of heaviest smokers and those who had quit smoking for the longest period of time, in whom there were elevated risks in the second to fourth quartiles of IGF-I relative to the first quartile (odds ratios, 2.21-2.91), although again, none achieved statistical significance. For younger subjects, IGF-I was inversely associated with lung cancer risk in the models that also controlled for IGFBP-3. Elevated risks for lung cancer were noted in the highest quartile of IGFBP-3 level, and these tended to be higher in current smokers and more recent quitters. These results do not support the conclusions of our prior case-control study. It is possible that current smoking or recent cessation may exert a suppressive effect on IGF-I levels (notably in younger subjects with higher baseline levels) that may obscure a relatively modest association between IGF-I level and lung cancer risk. On the other hand, risks associated with elevated IGFBP-3 level tended to be higher in current smokers and more recent quitters. This trend toward a positive association with IGFBP-3 level is unexpected and requires further investigation. Finally, from these data, we cannot exclude the possibility that risk of lung cancer in nonsmokers may be related to IGF-I levels.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».