MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2256546623 · doi:10.2523/100355-ms

Development and Deployment of Improved Performance "Green" Combined Scale/Corrosion Inhibitor for Subsea and Topside Application, North Sea Basin

2006· article· en· W2256546623 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueOffshore Engineering and Technologies
Établissements canadiensNalco (Canada)
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSubseaSoftware deploymentCitationEngineeringComputer scienceLibrary scienceMarine engineering

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Development and Deployment of improved performance "Green" Combined Scale/Corrosion Inhibitor for Subsea and Topside application, North Sea Basin. Myles Martin Jordan; Myles Martin Jordan Nalco Co. Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Neil D. Feasey; Neil D. Feasey Nalco Co. Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Matthew Budge; Matthew Budge Nalco Ltd Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Morag Robb Morag Robb Nalco Co. Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Paper presented at the SPE International Oilfield Corrosion Symposium, Aberdeen, UK, May 2006. Paper Number: SPE-100355-MS https://doi.org/10.2118/100355-MS Published: May 30 2006 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Get Permissions Search Site Citation Jordan, Myles Martin, Feasey, Neil D., Budge, Matthew, and Morag Robb. "Development and Deployment of improved performance "Green" Combined Scale/Corrosion Inhibitor for Subsea and Topside application, North Sea Basin.." Paper presented at the SPE International Oilfield Corrosion Symposium, Aberdeen, UK, May 2006. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/100355-MS Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentAll ProceedingsSociety of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)SPE International Oilfield Corrosion Conference and Exhibition Search Advanced Search AbstractEffective scale and corrosion control in production of hydrocarbon deposits is in many fields essential to the economic and safe production of these fluids. This paper presents field results and lessons learned from a North Sea field where a combined scale and corrosion inhibitor has been applied using a single formulation to control both the deposition of scale and associated corrosion. The use of a single product has facilitated a reduction in the number of umbilical lines to be used to provide flow assurance on the subsea flow lines and topside process of this facility. As part of the drive to reduce the environmental impact of production chemicals an improved performance formulation was developed. This formulation was required to contain no material on the current North Sea production chemical substitution list.The laboratory methods used to select the product along with measurement methods used in the field are also discussed. The impact of current environmental legislation on raw material selection will also be outlined. The validation of the laboratory selection methods in the field required the development of a monitoring program to establish base line control and to assess the degree of protection from scale deposition and corrosion across the process.The changing physical conditions within the flow lines and across the topside process will be described, as well as the changes in brine chemistry within the field, as injection water breakthrough occurred. This is vital for understanding how flow assurance was maintained and how treatment rates and products could be optimised.This paper will outline in detail the particular issues associated with chemical injection to a subsea facility, many of which are currently being developed in the Gulf of Mexico and West Africa.IntroductionScale and Corrosion Control in Subsea FacilitiesThe development of subsea facilities to improve the economics of marginal oilfield developments has focused attention on the need to develop single and combination production chemicals that can function in subsea environments. The recent development of long (> 20km) subsea tie backs in the North Sea, Gulf of Mexico and West Africa has focused attention on long term product stability at seabed temperatures and the associated product specification required for this kind of service. The following short section outlines some of the technical challenges and current methods that can be utilized to eliminate or at least reduce the risk to flow assurance by using such combination chemicals.Technical IssuesFewer umbilical lines.With fewer chemical injection lines being designed into subsea developments, the requirement for combination products has become increasingly important. In many cases these products involve the formulation of generic chemicals that would normally be considered to be incompatible or sparingly compatible when combined or mixed. To overcome this problem, multifunctional molecules (such as poly aspartic acid) have been developed which function as both a corrosion inhibitor and scale inhibitor. Conventional water based scale and corrosion inhibitors can also be formulated together with the aid of mutual solvent systems.Hydrate formation within chemicals.Most conventional production chemical formulations rely on water as the solvent. Cases have been reported in the North Sea where production gas has bled up subsea injection lines, due to the malfunctioning of non-return values. The result is the formation of a hydrate plug within the umbilical injection line. Keywords: flowline corrosion, materials and corrosion, Production Chemistry, Upstream Oil & Gas, riser corrosion, concentration, scale control, corrosion rate, treatment rate, evaluation Subjects: Production Chemistry, Metallurgy and Biology, Pipelines, Flowlines and Risers, Materials and corrosion, Well Integrity, Subsurface corrosion (tubing, casing, completion equipment, conductor) This content is only available via PDF. 2006. Society of Petroleum Engineers You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,485
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,437

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,004
Tête enseignante GPT0,164
Écart entre enseignants0,159 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

En bref

Citations5
Publié2006
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetOffshore Engineering and TechnologiesTravaux en français237 207