ROLE OF PRE-OPERATIVE FACTORS ON SUCCESS OF ARTHROSCOPIC DEBRIDEMENT FOR TREATMENT OF OSTEOARTHRITIS OF GLENOHUMERAL JOINT
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Summary Analysis of existing data of patients who had undergone debridement procedure for osteoarthritis (OA) of glenohumeral joint showed improvement in disability at a minimum of one year following surgery. Injured workers were significantly younger and had a poorer outcome. Introduction There is little information on debridement for OA of the shoulder joint. The purpose of this study was to examine factors that affect the outcome of arthroscopic debridement with or without acromioplasty /resection of clavicle of patients with osteoarthritis of the glenohumeral joint, in subjective perception of disability and functional range of motion and strength at a minimum of one year following surgery. Patients and Methods Existing data of patients with advanced OA of the glenohumeral joint who had undergone debridement were used for analysis. These patients were not good candidates for shoulder arthroplasty due to a young age, high activity level, or desire to avoid major surgery at the time of assessment. Arthroscopic debridement included removal of loose bodies, chondral flaps, and degenerative tissue. Resection of the lateral end of the clavicle or acromioplasty was performed as clinically indicated for management of osteoarthritis of the Acromioclavicular (AC) joint or subacromial impingement respectively. Disability at a minimum of 12 months following surgery was measured by the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon's (ASES) assessment form, Constant-Murley score (CMS), strength, and painfree range of motion (ROM) in four directions. Impact of sex, age, having acromioplasty or resection of clavicle, and having an active work-related compensation claim was examined. Results Seventy-four patients (mean age= 55, SD: 14 (range: 25–88), range: 35–86, 34 females, 40 males) were included in analysis. The average symptom duration was 5.8 years. Fifty nine (80%) patients had an associated subacromial decompression [55 (74%) had acromioplasty, 32(43%) had resection of the lateral end of the clavicle, and 28 (38%) had both procedures]. Nineteen (26%) patients had a work-related compensation claim related to their shoulder. This group was significantly younger than the non-compensation group (45 vs. 58, p=0.0001). Paired student t-tests showed a statistically significant improvement in scores of ASES and CMS (p<0.0001), strength (p=0.001) and painfree range of motion (p=0.01) at a minimum of 1 year follow-up. The ANCOVA model that incorporated sex, age, additional decompression (AC resection or acromioplasty), compensation claim and pre-op scores, showed that the pre-op scores and having a work-related claim were the most influential predictors of post-op scores of ASES, CMS, and ROM. The post-op strength was the only factor that was affected by sex, age and having a work-related claim. Discussion/Conclusion Arthroscopic debridement with or without acromioplasty /resection of the lateral end of the clavicle improved disability, painfree range of motion and strength in patients suffering from osteoarthritis of glenohumeral joint at a minimum of one year following surgery. Patients with an active compensation claim related to their shoulder were significantly younger and had a poorer outcome.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,008 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».