MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2258254054 · doi:10.1353/esc.2004.0003

Discursive Events in the Electronic Archive of Postmodern and Contemporary Poetry

2004· article· en· W2258254054 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Louis Cabri

Notice bibliographique

RevueEnglish studies in Canada · 2004
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueTheatre and Performance Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPoetryPostmodernismLiteratureHistoryArt

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Discursive Events in the Electronic Archive of Postmodern and Contemporary Poetry Louis Cabri University of Pennsylvania ^ I/he fo llo w in g excerpt is n o t Krapp spe a k in g , from Samuel Beckett’s 1958 one-act play, Krapp’s Last Tape, which features one actor and “a tape-recorder with microphone and a number of cardboard boxes containing reels ofrecorded tapes” (10). The following is David Antin writ­ ing, in a 1984 book of, as he calls them, talk poems. This excerpt is from the introduction to the published rendition of Antin’s talk-poem entitled “whos listening out there.” Italicizing introductory materials is a publish­ ing convention of drama that the Beckett play and the Antin talk-poem both follow. ... it was my habit to record my talks tofind out what id said (tuning 268) Antin is from the generation whose work would be anthologized as the New American poetry, but he went his own way, inventing an improvised talk genre beginning in the late 1960s that requires performance and inscription, audience and tape recorder and typewriter.1 1 Antin reflects in 2001 on his relationship to the i960 Donald Allen anthology The New American Poetry, “a poetry,” Antin declares, “I wasn’t very close to”: “I ESC 30.1 (March 2004): 51-72 Louis Cabri is completing Poetics of Political Economy, a dissertation on modern and postmodern American poetry, at the University of Pennsylvania. He curated the poetry event series, PhillyTalks, from 1997-2001, and presently sits on the board of Slought Foundation , a nonprofit artists’ space in Philadelphia. “After 1923: ‘The Social Command,’” an essay on the idea of a Marxian social in poetry, will appear in the “Reds” issue of XCP: Cross Cultural Poetics (Minneapolis, MN). I want to begin to address the event in relation to poetry by considering Antin’s evocative phrase, “to find out what id said.” There is, as Derrida might say, a double discovery to be made here. In Antin’s statement, the first discovery occurs by means of tape-recorder, and refers to what is said, and, one can add, to how it is said. By introducing variables of interpreta­ tion (context, tone, etc.), the question of how what is said is said, already hints at the doubling. To arrive at the second discovery contained in the phrase “to find out what id said,” imagine yourself Antin about to give a live talk before an audience. That is, shift your temporal sense from past-tense after to present-conditional before and present-conditional as the talking and tape­ recording happens. The second discovery occurs by means of audience presence, and mostly refers to what might be said. The present-conditional of this discovery does not leave a magnetic trace on the tape, is speculative. Derrida argues that in its Latin derivation, to invent is to find out what is already there waiting to be discovered, and also to found a speculation (“Psyche”). The double sense of invention applies in Antin’s case. By listen­ ing to the talk-poem recording, Antin discovers what he’s already said. In order to transcribe the talk-poem for publication, he must also speculate once again on the present-conditional moments of what he might say and how he might say it. That is, writing intervenes in the double discovery. Speculation on what he might have said is not an idle afterthought listen­ ing to the tape, but implicates editing the transcription and results in his distinctive representation of speech in the presentation of the talk-poems for publication (spacing between phrasal units, almost no punctuation, and no capitalized letters). Antin’s professed commitment to what he calls “dialogue” in his talks— in which no dialogue, as that word is generally understood, occurs (I will further detail this below)— is also speculative yet integral to inven­ tion in the above sense. It is the staging of talking as an event that invents the talking. In order to conceive of what might be said, one must already have staged a place or scene for talking, a pragmatics that enables certain possibilities of speech so that a speaking may be enacted...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,006
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,999
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,073

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0060,015
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0060,009
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0090,011
Communication savante0,0200,012
Science ouverte0,0010,009
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0220,003

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,023
Tête enseignante GPT0,235
Écart entre enseignants0,212 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2004
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEnglish studies in CanadaMême sujetTheatre and Performance StudiesTravaux en français237 207