Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Many governments of the world established or are establishing their own national institutions responsible for the protection and promotion of the equality. There are two types of the national institution for the enforcement of anti-discrimination laws: the one focused on the discrimination and the another comprehensive nation human rights institution. Anti-discrimination Commissions of the U.S. and Canada belong to the first type. They are role-models of the anti-discrimination Commission for another nations. The american federal Institution that enforce anti-discrimination laws of the U.S. is the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). The agency conducts the enforcement of anti-discrimination laws focusing on the area of occupation (workplace). The EEOC is composed of 5 commissioners, including a Chair and a Vice Chair, who are appointed for five-year by the President and confirmed by the Senate. As laws that are enforced by the EEOC, there are ① Title VII of the Civil Rights Act (Title VII, 1964), ② the Equal Pay Act (EPA, 1963), ③ the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA, 1967), and ④ the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA, 1990). Types of discrimination against that the U.S. anti-discrimination laws protect individuals are ① Age Discrimination, ② Disability Discrimination, ③ Equal Pay and Compensation Discrimination, ④ National Origin Discrimination, ⑤ Pregnancy Discrimination, ⑥ Race-Based Discrimination, ⑦ Religious Discrimination, ⑧ Retaliation, ⑨ Sex-Based Discrimination, and ⑩ Sexual Harassment. The EEOC is characterized by close liaison with courts of law and active using of alternative dispute resolutions (ADR). The Canadian Human Rights Commission (CHRC) is the canadian national Institution that enforce anti-discrimination laws of Canada. The Commission protects individuals from discriminatory practices not only on the area of occupation, but also on another areas related discrimination. The anti-discrimination laws administered by CHRC are ① Canadian Human Rights Act (CHRA, 1976-1977) and ② Employment Equity Act (EPA, 1995). According to the CHRA, it is unlawful to discriminate on the ground of ① race, ② national or ethic origin, ③ colour, ④ religion, ⑤ age, ⑥ sex, including pregnancy and childbearing, ⑦ sexual orientation, ⑧ marital status, ⑨ family status, ⑩ physical or mental disability, including dependence on alcohol or drugs, ⑪ pardoned criminal conviction. The characteristics of the CHRC are the dualism of the anti-discrimination institution: CHRC and Canadian Human Rights Tribunal (CHRT) and strengthening and promotion of services of alternative dispute resolutions (ADR), including arbitration, mediation, negotiation, conciliation, etc. The korean national institution that has the responsibility to ensure the korean anti-discrimination law (the National Human Rights Commission Act: NHRCA, 2002) is a comprehensive national human rights institution. The agency works to protect and promote human rights including both freedom and equality. It is necessary for the members of the korean National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) to strengthen their professional knowledge and experience and their sensitivity to human rights. And NHRC is required to reconstruct his role as the national institution for the anti-discrimination. Finally, it is needed to introduce actively and promote alternative dispute resolution (ADR) services that the anti-discrimination Commissions of the U.S. and Canada are using increasingly.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,007 | 0,006 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».