MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2260341426 · doi:10.14288/1.0091695

Phytoplankton ecology of Gwaii Haanas, Queen Charlotte Islands, British Columbia

2009· article· en· W2260341426 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Heather Naomi Juliet Toews

Notice bibliographique

RevuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEarth and Planetary Sciences
ThématiqueMarine and coastal plant biology
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésQueen (butterfly)PhytoplanktonEcologyOceanographyGeographyFisheryBiologyGeology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

A National Marine Conservation Area (NMCA) has been proposed for the waters around Gwaii Haanas National Park Reserve/Haida Heritage Site and Parks Canada is interested in obtaining information on the marine resources in the surrounding waters in order to monitor and manage this marine area. Samples were taken from the waters of the fjords and island passages of the proposed NMCA in order to study the relationships between physical and chemical parameters and abundance and diversity of the phytoplankton in these nearshore areas of Gwaii Haanas. This thesis reports nutrient concentrations, phytoplankton biomass (chlorophyll), and physical parameters during the summers (July and August) of 2001 and 2002 for these waters. Samples were collected using the PV Gwaii Haanas II as a ship-of-opportunity. A total often cruises were conducted and samples were taken for salinity, temperature, density, total suspended solids, Secchi disk depth, nitrate, phosphate, and silicic acid concentrations, chlorophyll a concentrations in two size fractions, and samples for phytoplankton identification. These data were compared for spatial and interannual differences by comparing coasts (east vs. west) and by comparing years (2001 vs. 2002). Variability was very high and few comparisons were significant. Mixed layers were shallow or non-existent on both coasts and in both years. Nutrient concentrations were significantly higher in 2002 than in 2001 as there was a greater intensity of upwelling in 2002 as compared with 2001. Nitrate was observed to be a factor limiting phytoplankton growth in a large proportion of stations, and consequently N:P and N:Si ratios were lower than that required for phytoplankton growth. Surface chlorophyll a concentrations showed no differences, but integrated chlorophyll a concentrations showed significantly higher concentrations in 2002 than in 2001. There was more sunlight and less precipitation in 2002 compared to 2001 and there was more phytoplankton at depth as the light penetrated deeper. The most abundant phytoplankton species were Leptocylindrus danicus, Chaetoceros spp., Thalassiosira spp., Skeletonema costatum, and a group of Pseudonitzschia species referred to as "A". Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) was performed on these data to determine the relationships between environmental variables and phytoplankton community composition. Most of the phytoplankton species and groups were observed where nutrient concentrations were high and the depth of light penetration was greater than average. Dinoflagellates were more often found in warmer water while diatoms were more often found where the water was colder. The depth of the mixed layer had the least influence on phytoplankton distribution while the silicic acid concentration had the greatest influence. This contradicts the real data which found silicic acid to be not a limiting factor at any of the stations. There was little spatial variability found in nutrient and chlorophyll a concentrations, only silicic acid had a significant difference between coasts with higher concentrations on the west coast than the east and the large size fraction (> 5 μm) of chlorophyll a was higher on the east coast than the west coast. Temporal variability was observed with higher nutrient and integrated chlorophyll a concentrations in 2002 compared to 2001. This study has provided the first extensive near-shore physical, chemical, and biological data in the waters surrounding Gwaii Haanas National Park Reserve/Haida Heritage Site, documenting nutrient and chlorophyll concentrations as well as providing a phytoplankton species list. These data will be useful as a baseline for continuing studies throughout Gwaii Haanas as it becomes an NMCA.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,034
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,070

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,001
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,005
Tête enseignante GPT0,149
Écart entre enseignants0,144 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2009
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)→Même sujetMarine and coastal plant biology→Travaux en français237 207→