Prothrombin Time and Bleeding Events in Patients Undergoing Total Hip or Knee Replacement Surgery Receiving 10 Mg Rivaroxaban.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Abstract 2099 Poster Board II-76 Rivaroxaban is a new, oral, direct Factor Xa inhibitor with a linear dose-relationship between Factor Xa inhibition and drug concentrations in plasma. It also affects global clotting tests such as prothrombin time (PT), particularly when Neoplastin® is used for testing. Rivaroxaban was investigated in four randomized, double-blind phase III studies (RECORD1, 2, 3, and 4) for the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after total hip or knee replacement surgery. This post hoc, explorative analysis evaluated the relationship between PT and bleeding events from pooled RECORD1–4 data. Patients were randomized to receive oral rivaroxaban 10 mg once daily (od) starting 6–8 hours after surgery, or subcutaneous enoxaparin 40 mg od starting the evening before surgery (RECORD1–3), or 30 mg twice daily starting 12–24 hours after wound closure (RECORD4). RECORD1, 3, and 4 were head-to-head comparisons of rivaroxaban and enoxaparin; RECORD2 compared extended-duration rivaroxaban with short-duration enoxaparin. Pooled analysis of the results of these studies showed that rivaroxaban significantly reduced the incidence of symptomatic VTE and death compared with enoxaparin regimens. The relationship between PT (measured by Neoplastin reagent) and adjudicated bleeding events was evaluated in 6,040 subjects valid for the safety analysis who underwent surgery and had taken at least one dose of rivaroxaban. The day of the surgery was defined as day 1. PT was measured on day 0 (baseline) and day 6 (trough and peak, and grouped according to quartiles). All adjudicated bleeding events were analyzed with respect to the day 6 measurements. The analysis focused on treatment-emergent adjudicated bleeding events up to 12±2 days after the initiation of active rivaroxaban administration. Bleeding events were grouped as major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding (composite) or any bleeding. A total of 5,912 patients had PT measurements at baseline; 345 experienced any bleeding event, of which 149 events were major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding events. Baseline mean PT ranged from 13.5 (with no bleeding) to 14.0 seconds (with any bleeding). Mean trough values on day 6 ranged from 14.3 (no bleeding) to 15.3 seconds (any bleeding). Mean peak values for PT on day 6 (measured at 2–4 hours after dosing) ranged from 18.9 (no bleeding) to 20.5 seconds (any bleeding). The peak/baseline PT ratios were 1.42 (no bleeding events), 1.46 (with major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding events), and 1.49 (any bleeding events). Of the patients with bleeding events, most events occurred in those with PT values in the extreme (Q4) peak and trough quartiles (Table). This explorative analysis indicated that PT values (seconds) in patients with no bleeding or with different types of bleeding were similar for each time point (baseline, day 6 trough and peak). The reproducible effects of rivaroxaban on PT are consistent with its known pharmacokinetics in plasma. Although extreme PT trough and peak values were associated with an increased risk of bleeding, this analysis suggests that PT over a wide range is not an accurate predictor of bleeding events in individual patients undergoing total hip or knee replacement surgery receiving 10 mg rivaroxaban. Refinement of PT testing methods has focused specifically on vitamin K antagonist (VKA) monitoring; therefore PT testing may be of greater utility for monitoring VKAs than Factor Xa inhibitors. Table. Percentage of patients with bleeding events grouped by prothrombin time peaks and troughs according to quartiles in rivaroxaban-treated patients from the RECORD1–4 studies Prothrombin time range (seconds) Patients with bleeding events (%) 95% confidence interval Any bleeding Prothrombin time day 6 trough Q1 9.1–12.9 3.00 2.11–4.10 Q2 >12.9–13.6 3.43 2.40–4.74 Q3 >13.6–14.7 4.89 3.66–6.38 Q4 >14.7–36.4 8.17 6.60–9.96 Prothrombin time day 6 peak Q1 10.0–16.0 3.70 2.66–4.98 Q2 >16.0–18.4 3.48 2.47–4.74 Q3 >18.4–21.1 4.11 3.01–5.45 Q4 >21.1–70.4 8.09 6.52–9.87 Major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding Prothrombin time day 6 trough Q1 9.1–12.9 1.54 0.92–2.39 Q2 >12.9–13.6 1.86 1.12–2.89 Q3 >13.6–14.7 1.92 1.17–2.94 Q4 >14.7–36.4 3.71 2.66–5.02 Prothrombin time day 6 peak Q1 10.0–16.0 1.62 0.96–2.55 Q2 >16.0–18.4 2.20 1.41–3.25 Q3 >18.4–21.1 1.73 1.04–2.69 Q4 >21.1–70.4 3.44 2.43–4.70 Day 6 trough: value at pre-dose on day 6. Day 6 peak: value at 2–4 hours post-dose on day 6. Q, quartile. Disclosures: Haas: Bayer Healthcare: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Sanofi-Aventis: Honoraria; CSL-Behring: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Turpie:Astellas: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; GSK: Consultancy; sanofi-aventis: Consultancy; Bayer Schering Pharma AG: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C: Consultancy; Portola: Consultancy. Lassen:Bayer Schering Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; sanofi-aventis: Consultancy; Astellas Pharma: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Pfizer Inc.: Consultancy. Kakkar:Aryx therapeutics: Consultancy; Eisai: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Scientific Advisory Board; Bristol–Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Scientific Advisory Board; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Scientific Advisory Board; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Scientific Advisory Board; Sanofi-Aventis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Scientific Advisory Board; Bayer HealthCare: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Scientific Advisory Board; GSK: Honoraria. Eriksson:Bayer Schering Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria. Vogtlaender:Bayer Schering Pharma AG: Employment. Kubitza:Bayer Schering Pharma AG: Employment. Mueck:Bayer Schering Pharma AG: Employment. Misselwitz:Bayer Schering Pharma AG: Employment, Patents & Royalties. Berkowitz:Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals : Employment.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».