Notice bibliographique
Résumé
I have reviewed the agency shop theory in this paper and tried to find a way to introduce this shop agreement into the Korean labor law. As is well known, the agency shop agreement was first formulated by the “Rand Formula” in the Ford Motor Co. case of Canada in 1946. And ever since, the formula became one of the main union security agreements acknowledged by the courts of Canada, U.S.A., U.K., and etc. The core of the agency shop agreement is that a trade union that is the bargaining representative for employees in a bargaining unit can make a collective agreement between the union and the employer of the employees a provision requiring the employer to deduct from the wages of each employee in the unit affected by the collective agreement, whether or not the employee is a member of the union, the expense of the union`s collective bargaining, collective agrement establishment and any other necessary expense thereof. The money deducted from each employee shall be in the amount of no more than the initiation fees and periodic dues of a union member, so as to prevent any compulsory membership against an individual worker`s will. The main focus of the agency shop is to prevent a ‘free rider` from the perspective of the union and its members regarding the establishment of a collective agreement and its beneficiaries. On the other while, there are some other legal concerns about the agency shop agreement. Two of the most frequently raised concerns are the protection of an individual worker`s religious belief, and the usage of the deducted expense for purposes other than the establishment of a collective agreement contrary to the expectation of non-union member workers. In the paper, I have reviewed how the two concerns are dealt with by the judicial authorities of Canada, U.S.A. and U.K. Despite the concerns about the agency shop, I find that the agency shop is one of the most practical and effective way to properly adjust the sometimes conflicting interests of unions and individual workers with a view to contributing to the idea of enhancing the economic and social status of workers and finally making peaceful industrial relations, which is the goal of the labor law. That is also the reason why the courts and labor authorities of Canada, U.S.A., and U.K. adhere to the principle of keeping agency shop agreement in a workplace. Under the current Korean labor law which allows multiple unions in a workplace, I want to suggest the agency shop agreement as a future solution of harmonizing the conflicting demands of union security and individual worker`s freedom of association.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,009 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,009 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,005 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,016 | 0,006 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».