The Transfer of technology to Taiwan : a look at the question of technical dependency and several factors affecting the choice of technology
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The term 'technology' refers to the totality of means employed by mankind to harness a variety of resources to its economic benefit. Levels of technology seriously affect economic growth. In the less developed countries (LDCs), where levels of economic development are by definition low, vast amounts of technology must be transferred in before any significant economic growth can become possible. This study is divided into three main areas. The first looks at channels for the transfer of technology with special attention to the question of continuing technical dependency. The second and third look at factors which, it is hypothesized, have an important bearing on the choice of technology namely: technology information, and a number of general, technology related factors. Continuing technical dependency is a widely discussed phenomenon in the literature on technology transfer. Much criticism has been directed at the transferor, especially the multinational corporation (MNC), for variously restricting the transferee's ability to gain the maximum advantage from the transferred technology. Because of the widespread nature of such criticism, it is expected that such restrictions will also be a problem in Taiwan. The aim of this part of the study is simply to ascertain the extent of the problem or, if there is little or no problem, to formulate hypotheses as to why this is the case. Information is essential in a technology transfer decision. Such information can come from inside the firm but the most important sources, it is expected, are those from the outside; commercial enterprises, government agencies, business associations, and special linkages (in particular subcontracting, and personal friends). It is expected that commercial sources will be the most prolific. The academic literature, however, describes such sources as often incomplete or biased. Thus, it is hypothesized that LDC transferees, despite their relative technical ignorance, will also perceive such sources thus, and will try to corroborate or supplement any information they receive. Government agencies for the gathering and dissemination of technical information have been established in a number of LDCs and it is expected that the government on Taiwan will have done likewise. However, it is hypothesized that, firstly, the ability of such an agency to provide relevant and timely information to potential transferees and, secondly, the willingness of such potential transferees to seek out and/or use such information will be limited. Business associations, on the ether hand, are expected to be a much more popular source of technology related information. Based on the Japanese model, it is expected that firms in Taiwan will have access to a high flow of information within their various associations, especially between the larger, more established firms and the smaller, newer firms, and especially in those industries characterized by distinct market areas, standard product lines and/or well established technologies. Sub-contracting is one kind of special linkage between firms which serves as an important source of technical information for small firms in Japan. As with the case of business associations, it is hypothesized that close historical as well as contemporary economic links between Taiwan and Japan will mean that such a source is also important in Taiwan. Another special link is, of course, personal contact. Given the extra degree of uncertainty involved in a LDC transfer of technology from a foreign, developed country, it is hypothesized that such personal contacts will play a role out of proportion to their real worth. The third main area of this study takes as its basic premise that the object of any transfer of technology is economic advantage. Three factors are looked at, however, which it is hypothesized, will have a major influence on the perception of this economic advantage. These factors are the complexity, compatibility and divisibility of the technology. Given the extraordinary technical adjustments which transfers to a LDC often demand, it is expected that such factors may well play a special role in the choice of technologies in such settings. As to the question of why do a study on the transfer of technology to Taiwan in particular, the answer is simply that, of all possible LDCs, Taiwan was the only one where the writer was equipped and able to do extensive field work. Taiwan,, of course, has many features in common with what might be thought of as the average LDC: it is in Asia, in a hot climate, has very few natural resources, is densely populated, has suffered serious social and economic disruptions within the lifetime of most of its citizens and has received generous amounts of foreign aid. Thus, it is in many ways representative of LDCs in general. More important, however, is the fact that despite these similarities, Taiwan's recent, rapid development has been so markedly dissimilar to the general pattern observed in LDC economies. This would seem to indicate that perhaps Taiwan has somehow been more successful in its experience with technology transfer. If so, a study of this experience might produce insights of value to other less successful transferees.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».