MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2263584310 · doi:10.14288/1.0100162

The Transfer of technology to Taiwan : a look at the question of technical dependency and several factors affecting the choice of technology

2010· article· en· W2263584310 sur OpenAlexaff
Thomas Richard Hoy

Notice bibliographique

RevuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2010
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueAsian Industrial and Economic Development
Établissements canadiensUniversity of British Columbia
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésTechnology transferDependency (UML)Computer scienceBusinessKnowledge managementArtificial intelligence

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The term 'technology' refers to the totality of means employed by mankind to harness a variety of resources to its economic benefit. Levels of technology seriously affect economic growth. In the less developed countries (LDCs), where levels of economic development are by definition low, vast amounts of technology must be transferred in before any significant economic growth can become possible. This study is divided into three main areas. The first looks at channels for the transfer of technology with special attention to the question of continuing technical dependency. The second and third look at factors which, it is hypothesized, have an important bearing on the choice of technology namely: technology information, and a number of general, technology related factors. Continuing technical dependency is a widely discussed phenomenon in the literature on technology transfer. Much criticism has been directed at the transferor, especially the multinational corporation (MNC), for variously restricting the transferee's ability to gain the maximum advantage from the transferred technology. Because of the widespread nature of such criticism, it is expected that such restrictions will also be a problem in Taiwan. The aim of this part of the study is simply to ascertain the extent of the problem or, if there is little or no problem, to formulate hypotheses as to why this is the case. Information is essential in a technology transfer decision. Such information can come from inside the firm but the most important sources, it is expected, are those from the outside; commercial enterprises, government agencies, business associations, and special linkages (in particular subcontracting, and personal friends). It is expected that commercial sources will be the most prolific. The academic literature, however, describes such sources as often incomplete or biased. Thus, it is hypothesized that LDC transferees, despite their relative technical ignorance, will also perceive such sources thus, and will try to corroborate or supplement any information they receive. Government agencies for the gathering and dissemination of technical information have been established in a number of LDCs and it is expected that the government on Taiwan will have done likewise. However, it is hypothesized that, firstly, the ability of such an agency to provide relevant and timely information to potential transferees and, secondly, the willingness of such potential transferees to seek out and/or use such information will be limited. Business associations, on the ether hand, are expected to be a much more popular source of technology related information. Based on the Japanese model, it is expected that firms in Taiwan will have access to a high flow of information within their various associations, especially between the larger, more established firms and the smaller, newer firms, and especially in those industries characterized by distinct market areas, standard product lines and/or well established technologies. Sub-contracting is one kind of special linkage between firms which serves as an important source of technical information for small firms in Japan. As with the case of business associations, it is hypothesized that close historical as well as contemporary economic links between Taiwan and Japan will mean that such a source is also important in Taiwan. Another special link is, of course, personal contact. Given the extra degree of uncertainty involved in a LDC transfer of technology from a foreign, developed country, it is hypothesized that such personal contacts will play a role out of proportion to their real worth. The third main area of this study takes as its basic premise that the object of any transfer of technology is economic advantage. Three factors are looked at, however, which it is hypothesized, will have a major influence on the perception of this economic advantage. These factors are the complexity, compatibility and divisibility of the technology. Given the extraordinary technical adjustments which transfers to a LDC often demand, it is expected that such factors may well play a special role in the choice of technologies in such settings. As to the question of why do a study on the transfer of technology to Taiwan in particular, the answer is simply that, of all possible LDCs, Taiwan was the only one where the writer was equipped and able to do extensive field work. Taiwan,, of course, has many features in common with what might be thought of as the average LDC: it is in Asia, in a hot climate, has very few natural resources, is densely populated, has suffered serious social and economic disruptions within the lifetime of most of its citizens and has received generous amounts of foreign aid. Thus, it is in many ways representative of LDCs in general. More important, however, is the fact that despite these similarities, Taiwan's recent, rapid development has been so markedly dissimilar to the general pattern observed in LDC economies. This would seem to indicate that perhaps Taiwan has somehow been more successful in its experience with technology transfer. If so, a study of this experience might produce insights of value to other less successful transferees.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,704
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,946

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,002
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,009
Tête enseignante GPT0,221
Écart entre enseignants0,211 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2010
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)Même sujetAsian Industrial and Economic DevelopmentTravaux en français237 207