Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In January 2007 a ruling by Ontario's highest court allowed a young boy to legally have three parents. The Ontario Court of Appeal's unanimous decision to give legal parental status to the lesbian partner of a biological mother - essentially giving the five-year-old London, Ontario., boy three parents . The court also ruled that the Children's Law Reform Act does not reflect current society and does not provide for the best interests of the child, who is raised by his lesbian mothers and visited by his biological father twice a week. From a child welfare perspective, this decision appears to be on the right track, providing much needed reform to existing family law. All of the evidence on alternative families says that they are just as good, or better, than traditional families. What matters, from the child's perspective, are stable relationships with adults. However, before we open up the door to a wider, more diverse range of family forms we ought also to consider the parental perspective. Harry Brighouse and Adam Swift argue that there are important goods of parenting that can only be achieved in something like the traditional family. (I say 'something like' as nothing in Brighouse-Swift argument rules out parenting by same sex couples.) For example, Brighouse and Swift argue against well-run state orphanages on these grounds. Even if a state successfully used orphanages to foster diversity and fulfill children's needs excellently, there would be a serious loss of value and flourishing. Many adults would be unable to engage in activities and relationships that make an in eliminable and great contribution to their ability to flourish. They could not get access to the full package of these activities and relationships by becoming teachers at the orphanages, because, in the role of teacher, they could not enjoy the relevant kind of intimacy with, or exercise the relevant kind of legitimate partiality with respect to, a small number of particular children. Such a society would be unacceptably diminished even if children were well reared. In this paper I want to examine the child welfare argument for family reform which would open up the door to a much broader range of possible family structures in light of Brighouse and Swift's argument for parental rights. I'm interested in seeing how and where children's welfare and parental rights conflict and in seeing how we might settle the differences that exist between the two sets of considerations.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,010 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,007 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,035 | 0,009 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».