Employment status among low-income Caucasian and Latina breast cancer survivors
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
6612 Background: Return to work (RTW) after breast cancer is associated with treatment recovery and quality of life. Prior research has found an 80% RTW rate in primarily Caucasian breast cancer survivors; however, little is known about the trajectory of RTW among Latinas. Qualitative research suggests that RTW is a major concern for Latinas. This study compares the rate of RTW between Latinas and Caucasians and investigates the role of job type in RTW. Methods: This is a prospective, longitudinal study of low-income, underserved breast cancer survivors who spoke English or Spanish, did not have metastatic disease, and were enrolled in the Medi-Cal Breast and Cervical Cancer Treatment Program. We interviewed survivors at 6 mos., 18 mos., and 3 yrs. after diagnosis to assess changes in employment status. The impact of independent variables including ethnicity, employment at diagnosis, job type, age, health status, and education was assessed using chi-square tests. Results: 666 survivors completed surveys at both 6 mos. and 3 yrs; 65% were Latina. The median age was 49 and 54 yrs. for Latinas and Caucasians, respectively (p < 0.001). 45% of Latinas had less than a high-school education compared to 3% of Caucasians (p < 0.001). The majority of Latinas worked in 3 job types: personal care-provider (23%), housekeeper (22%), and manufacturing (13%). Caucasians had greater job diversity, including clerical (15%), personal care-provider (13%), food preparer/server (12%), and sales (10%). At diagnosis, 51% of Latinas and 59% of Caucasians were employed (p = 0.07), and among these, Latinas were less likely to be working at 6 and 18 mos. than Caucasians (27% vs. 47% at 6 mos., p = 0.002 and 45% vs. 59% at 18 mos., p = 0.026). This difference dissipated by yr. 3 (53% of Latinas vs. 58% of Caucasians, p = 0.41). Job type at diagnosis was associated with RTW. Conclusions: Employed low-income Latinas and Caucasians appear to follow different RTW trajectories after breast cancer, with fewer Latinas working at 6 and 18 mos. Differences exist in job type between these populations; Caucasians have greater variation in job type and a trend toward greater likelihood of changing job type after breast cancer. This may reflect limitations in career choice among low-income Latinas and may be related to their protracted RTW trajectory. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».