MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2264616002 · doi:10.1093/pch/19.8.e117

Case 1: Unilateral leg swelling in a toddler

2014· article· en· W2264616002 sur OpenAlexaff
Michelle T. Long, Raveena Ramphal, Nishard Abdeen, Donna L. Johnston

Notice bibliographique

RevuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueRenal and related cancers
Établissements canadiensChildren's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicinePhysical examinationEdemaBlood pressureUrinalysisSurgeryAnesthesiaInternal medicineUrine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

A previously healthy three-year-old boy presented to the paediatric emergency department with a two-day history of left lower extremity swelling, tenderness and refusal to walk. There was no history of fever, recent travel, immobilization or trauma to the extremity. In the month leading up to his presentation, the patient was also noted by his mother to have decreased appetite and was requiring increasingly larger diaper sizes. His review of systems was otherwise unremarkable. On examination, he was afebrile, with a normal heart rate and elevated blood pressure (115/68 mmHg). He was alert and in no acute distress. Examination of the left lower extremity revealed warmth, swelling and erythema of the inguinal region, with increased thigh girth compared to the right. There was no pitting edema distally. Bloodwork revealed a decreased hemoglobin level (104 g/L) and normal white blood cell and platelet counts, electrolyte levels, renal function and uric acid. Urinalysis was normal. The lactate dehydrogenase level was elevated (1028 U/L; normal range 150 U/L to 360 U/L). Ultrasound examination led to the diagnosis. Ultrasonography revealed a well-circumscribed mass replacing the right kidney consistent with Wilms tumour, with inferior vena cava, common femoral and left external iliac vein extension. A computed tomography (CT) scan provided further definition (Figure 1). Coronal reformat from contrast-enhanced computed tomography shows enhancing tumour thrombus filling the inferior vena cava (white arrow) and extending into the right common iliac vein (black arrowhead) and more distally into the left common iliac vein (white arrowhead). The large mass in the right kidney (star) has similar attenuation to the tumour thrombus Our patient presented with localized lower extremity swelling, an uncommon presentation of Wilms tumour. The evaluation of localized edema in paediatric patients requires consideration of the pathogenesis. Localized edema can be categorized into three etiologies: venous obstruction causing increased capillary hydro-static pressure; vascular wall dysfunction causing increased capillary permeability; or lymphatic dysfunction causing increased interstitial hydrostatic pressure. Edema always occurs distal to the site of obstruction in the context of venous obstruction by thrombosis or external compression. The severity is determined by the degree of obstruction, and signs of thrombophlebitis (tenderness, erythema) may be present. With localized edema, venous thrombosis is a likely etiology and the clinician must look for underlying causes. Angioedema leading to increased capillary permeability is characterized by swelling in the deep layers of the cutaneous or submucosal tissues and can be allergic or hereditary in nature. The distribution of swelling is generally not in dependent areas but in the face, tongue, lips or larynx. Finally, localized edema can also be a result of lymphatic dys-function leading to accumulation of interstitial fluid, and may accompany reactive lymphadenitis, autoimmune diseases or genetic conditions. Isolated lymphedema of the leg is often idiopathic in nature. The evaluation of a child presenting with localized swelling requires a thorough history and physical examination. On history, important details to obtain include: location and duration of swelling, associated systemic symptoms, allergies, medications, weight gain and family history. Physical examination should include vital signs, growth parameters and localization of the area of swelling for erythema or tenderness. Laboratory studies may include a complete blood count, renal and liver function tests, and urinalysis. In a child with suspected venous thrombosis, in addition to Doppler ultrasonography, coagulation studies should be considered. Therapeutic interventions for the localized edema will be tailored according to the underlying cause. In our patient, unilateral lower extremity edema was secondary to Wilms tumour with intravascular extension. Wilms tumour accounts for approximately 6% of all childhood cancers (1). The most common initial presentation is the discovery of an asymptomatic abdominal mass. Other presenting complaints include abdominal pain, hematuria and hypertension. Intravascular tumour extension occurs in approximately 11% of cases, with involvement of the inferior vena cava, hepatic veins or right atrium (1). Currently, there are no reported cases of Wilms tumour extension downward into the femoral or iliac veins, as observed in our patient. Initial diagnostic studies include ultrasonography and CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis to determine the location/size of the mass. Magnetic resonance imaging can be used to evaluate for intravascular tumour extension. A CT scan of the chest for pulmonary involvement should be performed because this is the most common site of metastasis (1). Either upfront chemotherapy followed by surgery (European approach), or the reverse (North American approach), are used for therapy and have similar outcomes. One potential risk of upfront chemotherapy is adverse effect on staging and histological evaluation, leading to over- or undertreatment (1). For patients with intravascular tumour extension, strong consideration of preoperative chemotherapy is recommended (1), and studies have shown no significant differences in survival compared with patients without intravascular extension (2). The survival rate for Wilms tumour is approximately 90%. Following the diagnosis of Wilms tumour, our patient received neoadjuvant chemotherapy for eight weeks followed by surgical resection of the tumour and intravascular tumour thrombus. He is currently doing well. In children presenting with localized edema, especially of the lower extremities, a complete history and physical examination, including a thorough abdominal examination, should be performed to rule out potential life-threatening causes such as a malignancy resulting in venous obstruction. Children who present with a thrombotic event usually have an underlying cause for thrombosis that must be explored. Wilms tumour is common in children and has a high survival rate with appropriate therapy.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Étude de cas · Signal consensuel: Étude de cas
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,005
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,012

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,002
Bibliométrie0,0020,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,002
Communication savante0,0020,002
Science ouverte0,0020,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0040,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,008
Tête enseignante GPT0,241
Écart entre enseignants0,234 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeÉtude de cas
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2014
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePaediatrics & Child HealthMême sujetRenal and related cancersTravaux en français237 207