MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2266176049 · doi:10.1353/esc.2015.0033

Finding Common Ground: Purposeful Disarticulation in the Poetry of Erin Mouré

2015· article· en· W2266176049 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Shirley A. McDonald

Notice bibliographique

RevueEnglish studies in Canada · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueModern American Literature Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPoetryTrilogyLiteratureSublimePhilosophyCommon groundTrope (literature)IntertextualityHistoryArtSociology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Finding Common Ground:Purposeful Disarticulation in the Poetry of Erin Mouré Shirley McDonald (bio) “Where do we go when we die?” asks Billy. “I don’t know. Where are we now?” is the gypsy’s reply. Erin Mouré O Cidadán: poems This fragment of dialogue from The City of the Plains—the third volume of Cormac McCarthy’s Border Trilogy—exemplifies the various moments of playful intertextuality that one comes to expect from the poems of Erin Mouré. The lines mark McCarthy’s engagement with what Kant describes as dynamical philosophy (108–09) and, thus, find themselves well placed in the middle of Mouré’s poem, which is likewise engaged. Connections between McCarthy’s lines and Mouré’s poem depend not only on their common subject matter but upon the similarity between the title of McCarthy’s novel and a title hidden as a detail in the poem: St Augustine’s ecumenical work, The City of God. Mouré gestures toward McCarthy’s text merely by the dialogue fragment, and St Augustine’s, by identifying him first by name and then as “A” followed by a reference to “his City” (O Cidadán 68). Reverberations of a philosophical nature continue to resonate among Mouré’s poem, McCarthy’s novel, and [End Page 109] St Augustine’s work in their common concern with what is unknowable about the sublime and, yet, what is attractive. Mouré alludes to the power of The City of the Plains and The City of God to act as “heliotrope response device[s]”—implicitly, at least, in the title of the poem in which she refers to them: “document25 (heliotrope response device).” The poem itself is such a device as it draws its readers toward the unknowable as flowers of a “heliotrope” are drawn toward the sun (68). An obscure but significant aspect of heliotropism is growth. When Mouré uses the concept allegorically, she alludes to stimulus potentially rendered from poetry. As Kant states, “‘Poetry fortifies the mind: for it lets the mind feel its ability—free, spontaneous, and independent of natural determinism—to contemplate and judge phenomenal nature as having aspects that nature does not on its own offer in experience either to sense or to the understanding’” (quoted in Tiffany 76). Mouré’s hermeneutical poetics stimulate growth by inviting the reader to participate in a philosophical exercise that is playfully exuberant. Such effort often ends, however, in less than an adequate grasp of a poem’s meaning. For example, Mouré’s allusion to the myth of Dido, especially in her absence from the Augustinian city—“But what is a city of god with no Dido. / Dido=grace, too” (68) problematizes the reading, but to what avail? Is the poet’s reference to Dido meant only to invoke a kind of playfulness or is there something else? Despite O Cidadán: poem’s intellectual attraction—that heliotropic effect—deciphering its meaning proves to be an insuperable task. Indeed, the body of Mouré’s poetics readily offers little explicit meaning. Such is the enigmatic nature, as well, of the allusions to the sublime that register in her poems. There are recognizable signifiers, however, that operate as a pattern of ever-widening circles of expansion, a movement marked by the poet’s shifting subjectivity as she evolves from her self-inscription as a daughter to a lover to a national citizen to a philosopher exploring the world within its earthly grounding, adopting, as does Mouré, Heideggerian images of the sublime. “The readings we can give each other, and the world,” she writes, “are the world, the ‘sense / to come,’ and construct our ‘selves’ where ‘we art.’ As if reading itself is localization, situation, siting” (68). The process of expansion within Mouré’s poetry marks her re-signification of selfhood in new and ever-changing identities within the realms of “localization, situation, [and] siting.” As I seek to demonstrate, expansion marks the author’s identity and places her on common ground with other philosophers within the realms of cognitive poetics and language. I explore Mouré’s poetry through posthumanist, phenomenological, and ideological [End Page 110] modes of analysis to extrapolate on the author’s representations of life experiences...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,006
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,015

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,005
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0060,017
Communication savante0,0050,004
Science ouverte0,0010,004
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,090
Tête enseignante GPT0,288
Écart entre enseignants0,198 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEnglish studies in CanadaMême sujetModern American Literature StudiesTravaux en français237 207