MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2266392404 · doi:10.1093/pch/19.2.72

The practice of traditional rituals and customs in newborns by mothers in selected villages in southwest Uganda

2014· article· en· W2266392404 sur OpenAlexafffund
Florence Beinempaka, Basil Tibanyendera, Fortunate Atwine, Teddy Kyomuhangi, Noni E. MacDonald

Notice bibliographique

RevuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueGlobal Maternal and Child Health
Établissements canadiensResearch CanadaDalhousie University
Organismes subventionnairesInternational Development Research CentreMicroResearch
Mots-clésMedicineReferralPopulationPregnancyInfant mortalityNeonatal mortalityFamily medicineDemographyPediatricsObstetricsEnvironmental health

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Between 1990 and 2011, neonatal mortality dropped from 32 to 22 per 1000 live births globally, but has remained above 30 per 1000 live births in Africa. Many neonatal deaths are preventable with support for healthy pregnancies, deliveries and newborn care. Continuation of traditional pregnancy/birth rituals may be placing some mothers/neonates at risk. The Ankole region of Uganda has a population of approximately eight million, and approximately 10,000 live referral hospital births annually. However, most babies are born at home in their villages because women avoid going to the hospital unless complications occur. The purpose of the present study was to determine what potentially harmful traditional pregnancy/birth rituals were practiced in the Ankole region, and to develop Village Health Team (VHT; volunteer community workers with limited health training) mitigation strategies. Ten villages were randomly selected to participate in focus group discussions (FGD) regarding traditional pregnancy/birth customs. For each village FGD, eight to 12 individuals were purposively selected with VHT help. FGD invitees included maternal/newborn caregivers (eg, traditional birth attendant, grandmother or father, herbalist or village child specialist). Individual informed verbal consent was obtained. Open-ended prompts were used to initiate discussions. Sessions were recorded, transcribed verbatim and analyzed qualitatively for study thematic areas including pregnancy, newborn baby, umbilical cord and placenta – all categories with specific traditional rituals and customs. The study was approved by the Mbarara University of Science and Technology Institutional Ethical Review Committee (Mbarara, Uganda). A total of 67 women and 37 men participated. They noted that child bearing in Kinyankore culture was held in high esteem, was sacred and shrouded in mystery, delicacy and sanctity. The following potentially risky traditional pregnancy/birthing rituals were described: Herbs are orally ingested and vaginally inserted to cleanse the unborn baby through to term (ie, infection risk). Handling and disposal of the placenta as though it is another living baby – risk of postdelivery infection of much-handled placenta with transfer back to mother or baby. The newborn's head is moulded on a ‘borning’ fire (forcefully bent to shape over fire lit for the birth) The mother's first milk is prohibited because it may make the baby ill so it is given other fluids (ie, no colostrum given but instead potentially contaminated liquids) Cord care: cutting baby's cord with a reed; adding mother's or friends' spit and/or materials such as dust, herbs, cow-dung powder and/or soot to the cord/stump to encourage healing (ie, infection risk). For babies born in a health facility, traditional rituals are practiced when the baby goes home to the village. Many Ankole traditional pregnancy/birth customs contravene WHO recommended health care practices. VHTs need to understand these traditions to provide better maternal/neonatal care in their villages. Prevention steps may include providing VHTs with context-based education to help them better counsel both pregnant women and community members against risky practices. Protocols are needed to enhance VHTs' recognition of women/newborns at risk for ritual-related complications needing close follow-up and early referral to hospital. This project was funded by Save the Children Uganda and Healthy Child Uganda and supported with mentoring from MicroResearch. MicroResearch is funded in part by the International Development Research Centre through the Global Health Research Initiative.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,011
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,021

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,008
Tête enseignante GPT0,258
Écart entre enseignants0,251 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations12
Publié2014
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePaediatrics & Child HealthMême sujetGlobal Maternal and Child HealthTravaux en français237 207