Molecular epidemiology and evolution of type 2 porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus in Ontario, Canada
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Recently, progress was made in collecting, classifying, and characterizing the genetic diversity of type 2 porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) using all known and publically available sequencing information. Despite this voluminous attempt, these analyses were largely na?ve of the Canadian contribution to circulating viruses. This represented a vital omission in the study of molecular epidemiology due to the fact that Canada had recorded the earliest evidence of the existence of type 2 PRRSV. To this end, the genetic diversity and evolutionary aspects of PRRSVs distributed in the Province of Ontario in Canada were characterized to abridge this existing knowledge gap on type 2 PRRSV. \n\n\n\nGenotyping of type 2 strains is primarily based on either a phylogenetic or restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) approach. Classification of Ontario PRRSV field isolates (n = 505) from 1999 to 2010, based on a global type 2 PRRSV ORF5 phylogenetic framework, revealed genetic diversity comparable to PRRSV in the USA, with sequences assigned to five of nine lineages (1, 2, 5, 8 and 9). A majority (~85%) of these isolates were typed to the first two lineages (1 and 2). Despite a relatively smaller sample size to the USA, the topology of the phylogenetic tree indicated Canadian origins of these two lineages. Mapping RFLP patterns of Ontario isolates onto the phylogenetic tree revealed numerous examples of different patterns located within the same phylogenetic cluster. Examples of the non-specificity of RFLP patterns to any particular lineage or sub-lineage were abound. Statistical analysis showed occurrences where similar RFLP patterns masked diverse genetic distances and instances of close genetic proximity with divergent RFLP patterns. An examination of the most abundant 15 RFLP patterns revealed that the discrepancy between RFLP typing and genetic distances was not attributable to a single or few patterns but was rather a permeating feature.\n\n\n\nImportantly, the tree topology also indicated a Canadian ancestry for the highly virulent MN184-related strains that first emerged in 2001 in the USA. Selective pressure analyses highlighted a handful of positively selected sites most of which were located in the ORF5 ectodomains of outbreak strains, implicating the host immune system as the possible selective agent. This was in contrast to the closely-related Ontario strains which were subject to strong purifying selection. A broader survey of transmission dynamics in North America unveiled a higher virus flow from Canada to the USA with the primary targets being the Lake States and Corn Belt. In turn, these regions served to disseminate viruses to other swine production regions in the USA. Virus flow from the USA to Canada occurred on a much smaller scale.\n\n\n\nCollectively, extensive genetic diversity prevails in type 2 PRRSV in one region of the North American swine industry and it is not described adequately by RFLP typing which might have some value in differentiating strains at the local farm level, instead. For diagnostic and research purposes, phylogenetic typing should be the preferred method. Finally, stronger surveillance needs to be adopted to minimize cross-border virus transmission.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».