Success of sildenafil for erectile dysfunction in men treated with brachytherapy or external beam radiation for prostate cancer.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
PURPOSE: We undertook to determine if any significant differences in the efficacy of sildenafil citrate for erectile dysfunction (ED) exists between patients who have received external beam radiation or brachytherapy for prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-one patients who had received external beam radiation and nineteen patients who had received brachytherapy for prostate cancer and were subsequently treated with sildenafil citrate for post-irradiation ED comprised the patient population. A chart analysis was performed to determine either the presence or absence of concomitant risk factors for ED (coronary artery disease, diabetes, hypertension and smoking history) as well as age at radiation and time lapse between radiation completion and sildenafil citrate administration. Patients were then contacted to ascertain sildenafil citrate efficacy (defined as the continued use of sildenafil citrate), dosage used and medication tolerance. RESULTS: Continued use of sildenafil citrate was reported by 12/19 (63%) of the brachytherapy patients and 7/31 (22%) of the external beam radiation patients, a significant difference (P<0.007). Of those with continued use of sildenafil citrate, the patients who had undergone external beam radiation had a longer mean period of use (33.7 months) than those who had been treated with brachytherapy (14.3 months) (P=0.006). The mean elapsed time between completion of radiation and administration of sildenafil citrate was 7.6 months and 21.6 months for the brachytherapy and external beam radiation patients respectively (P=0.002). A significant difference in mean age existed between the patient groups, with the external beam radiation group being significantly older (69.8 years and 65.1 years respectively, P=0.007) at the time of sildenafil citrate administration. Of the risk factors for ED examined in each patient group, none were found to predict treatment failure with sildenafil citrate. Of the patients who did not experience success with sildenafil citrate, both groups used the medication for comparable periods of time. CONCLUSIONS: Sildenafil citrate improved ED in a significantly greater number of patients who had undergone brachytherapy over those who had received external beam radiation. However, the patients who had received external beam radiation were both older and experienced a longer lapse of time between completion of radiotherapy and administration of sildenafil citrate than the brachytherapy patient group. This may explain the poorer success in the external beam radiation patients. The success of sildenafil in both groups of patients was lower than has previously been reported.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».