MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2268369446

The performance analysis of a portable mobile mapping system with different GNSS processing strategies

2013· article· en· W2268369446 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueRobotics and Sensor-Based Localization
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMobile mappingGNSS applicationsComputer scienceGeospatial analysisOrientation (vector space)CadastreRemote sensingMobile deviceInertial measurement unitData acquisitionFrame (networking)Computer visionReal-time computingGlobal Positioning SystemArtificial intelligenceGeographyTelecommunicationsCartography
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Over the years, land vehicular based Mobile Mapping Systems (MMSs) have demonstrated that accuracies suitable for all but the most demanding cadastral and engineering applications can be achieved. Mobile mapping refers to a means of collecting geospatial data using mapping sensors that are mounted on a mobile platform. This result, combined with a reduction in both the time and cost of data collection, made MMS a very interesting technology potentially able to meet the demand of spatial information system operators for rapid spatial data acquisition. The idea of mobile mapping is basically executed by producing more than one image that includes the same object from different positions, and then the 3D positions of the same object with respect to the mapping frame can be measured. Multi-platform and multi-sensor integrated mapping technology has clearly established a trend towards fast geospatial data acquisition. Sensors can be mounted on a variety of platforms, such as satellites, aircraft, helicopters, terrestrial vehicles, water-based vessels, and even people. As a result, mapping has become mobile, and dynamic. Since the early nineties, advances in satellite and inertial technology made it possible to think about mobile mapping in a new way. Instead of using ground control points (GCP) as references for orienting the images in space, the trajectory and orientation of the imager platform can now be determined directly. Cameras, along with positioning and orientation sensors, are integrated and mounted on a land vehicle for mapping purposes. Objects of interest can be directly measured and mapped from images that have been georeferenced using positioning and orientation sensors. The development of land vehicular based mobile mapping systems was initiated by two research groups in North America, The Center for Mapping at Ohio State University, USA, and the Department of Geomatics Engineering at the University of Calgary, Canada to fulfill the need for highway infrastructure mapping and transportation corridor inventories. In the early 2000s, numerous land vehicular based mobile mapping systems have been utilized in commercial applications. Over the last five years, Google has adopted the technology on a large scale, introducing substantial fleets of mobile mapping vehicles for their imaging and mapping operations then producing fruitful spatial information content for added value applications. This has resulted in the further rapid development of the technology which can now be regarded as being well established and proven. However, the high costs involved in the development of such systems limits their growth in the market, so that land vehicular based MMSs are still mainly operated by the companies or institutions that build them. In addition, the primary limitation of such land vehicular based systems in terms of operation flexibility is the dependence of the availability and quality of road networks. Sometime streets in the metropolitan area are too narrow for land vehicle to operate. In addition, at distances greater than 20 to 30 km from a reference station, the residual ppm error caused by the atmosphere delaying. Hence with traditional processing, it is always necessary to be within 30 km of a reference station sometime during the mission in order to resolve the ambiguities. Once the correction are resolved, the PMMs can be operated to about 75 km from the nearest reference station before the magnitude of the ppm error exceeds level required for high-accuracy applications. For land-based applications a significant productivity improvement in Real-Time Kinematic (RTK) positioning has been achieved using the concept of a “Virtual Reference Station” or VRS. The objective of this study is developed a prototype of PMMS to allow a wider community of spatial data user to benefit of mobile mapping applications - in particular the lower costs and greater efficiency of data collection and validation of DG performance between based on traditional method and VRS. The proposed PMMS is composed of a tactical grade Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU), dual frequencies Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) receiver, two digital cameras, a centralized power supply as well as data storage unit to avoid the use of computer or laptop. Data processing modules including Position and Orientation System (POS) module, mounting calibration (boresight and lever arm) module and close range photogrammetry module are developed in this study. The proposed mounting calibration method is two-Step that averages the lever-arm and boersight including each epoch, respectively. In addition, different GNSS processing strategies applied for proposed PMMS operation including conventional differential GNSS with a physical reference station, differential GNSS with VRS and Precise Point Positioning (PPP) are investigated in terms of their Direct Georeferencing (DG) performance. Preliminary results presented in this study including two parts as calibration and DG. In the aspect of calibration, the accuracies of lever-arm and boresight are about 1-3 centimeters and less than 0.5 degree through error propagation. In the word, it will cause 4-7 cm error for 5 meters. On the other hand, by comparing DG results of checking points provided by the proposed PMMS from various scenarios with their known coordinates depicts the absolute 3D positioning accuracy can reach less than 10 centimeters when the object distance is around 20 meters based on DGNSS and VRS. With the inclusion of the PPP and VRS GNSS processing strategy, the proposed PMMS can be deployed immediately in a designated area to gather useful geo-referenced spatial information without sending ground crews for GCP surveying as well as arranging master GPS stations for DGNSS processing to gain sufficient accuracy for mapping and other rapid urgent response for disaster relief applications.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Simulation ou modélisation · Signal consensuel: Simulation ou modélisation
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,206
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,180

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,006
Tête enseignante GPT0,173
Écart entre enseignants0,168 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

En bref

Citations3
Publié2013
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetRobotics and Sensor-Based LocalizationTravaux en français237 207