MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W226902985

The Paradoxical Success of Canadian Jews. (Book Reviews/Comptes Rendus)

2003· article· en· W226902985 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Y. Michal Bodemann

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Canadian Journal of Sociology · 2003
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCanadian Identity and History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésJudaismPessimismEthnic groupSociologyPopulationHistoryReligious studiesLawTheologyPolitical scienceAnthropologyDemographyPhilosophy
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Morton Weinfeld, Like Everyone Else, But Different. The Paradoxical Success of Canadian Jews. Toronto: McClelland & Stewart, 2001, 446 pp. Trying to review this comprehensive and encyclopaedic book on contemporary Jewry in Canada is no mean feat. It is difficult to think of any aspect that its author may have left out and it is impossible to map the full content in this review. With seemingly total command of sources, his own deep involvement in the community and the particular perspective from Montreal to boot, Morton Weinfeld presents us with what might best be described as a demographic ethnography of Canadian Jewry at the turn of the millennium; while it accomplishes far more, it follows in the footsteps, more than sixty years ago, of Louis Rosenberg's classic Canada's Jews, published in 1939. Clearly, for what the author is trying to accomplish, his consummate demographic skills are particularly useful. We learn that, pessimistic predictions notwithstanding, the Jewish population in Canada has been growing steadily over the past 20 years. In 1991, the numbers stood at somewhere between 356,000 and 406,000 Jews, depending on more or less inclusive, ethnic or religious definitions. (Here we might quibble with him and suggest that, following demographers Sidney Goldstein or Sergio Della Pergola, he might have used still more inclusive parameters, for example, adding to the Jewish periphery ethnically and religiously non-Jewish persons living with Jewish partners and following certain Jewish traditions without, however, being formally converted. No good reason to exclude this group, especially as they must constitute quite significant numbers here as well, in my estimate upping the total figure to over 450,000 Jews.) Weinfeld nevertheless discusses in some detail other aspects of the margins of the community. For 100 born Jews by religion, there are another 44 Jews who are either secular, of Jewish ancestry only, or who are Jews by choice, i.e., converts. The latter group alone might be as high as 8 or 10 for every hundred ethno-religiously identified Jews. As far as intermarriage goes, since the late 1970's these rates have been fairly stable at close to 30%, whereas at around 1960, they still stood at around 10% -- an astonishingly rapid jump in only two decades and surprising stability ever since. The figures about the internal, sub-ethnic, composition of Canadian Jewry to which Weinfeld addresses himself in detail are telling as well. On top of the largely Eastern European bedrock, based on the massive immigration from around the first World War, the community was significantly shaped by the influx after World War II: approximately 34,000 Jews, mostly survivors, had arrived by about 1952 and more of that group would arrive in the following decade. These 16%, likely more, had a particularly significant impact on the self definition and the habitus of Canadian Jewry at large. Somewhat later on, another 20,000 Jews of entirely different stock would arrive from North Africa, with particularly significant impact on the ethnic constellation in Quebec, between Francophones and a largely anglophone Jewry. Since the 1980's, finally, approximately 40,000 or 50,000 Jews arrived from the former Soviet Union, and it is estimated that up to 15,000 Israelis have come to Canada as well. While it is pretty apparent that the old Ashkenasic groupings constitute some semblance of a unitary ethnic group, this remains an open question with regard especially to the Israeli, Francophone North African and the Russian emigration. This raises the question, can we actually speak of a unitary Jewish community in any way: in which ways, for example, are the Ethiopian Jewish immigrants part of that Jewish community? …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,168
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,338

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0040,007
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,002
Communication savante0,0050,002
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0280,008

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,039
Tête enseignante GPT0,271
Écart entre enseignants0,232 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2003
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Canadian Journal of SociologyMême sujetCanadian Identity and HistoryTravaux en français237 207