Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This dissertation explores a model of social change which I have labeled "dialogic."Each of the three cases I have chosen for this study has been included because I believe that the design of each intervention departs significantly and creatively from traditional, less Other-oriented, social change efforts.Dialogic social change begins with the assumption that human beings cannot be developed, modernized, or empowered by external parties.Instead, this conception of change is guided by the assumption that individuals are autonomous, trustworthy beings who are capable of deciding when to engage with new ideas and opportunities for action.First, I analyze the strategic communication of the "Billionaires for Bush," a group of playful and ironic protesters, most active in New York City preceding the 2004 U.S. Presidential election.In this case I focus on the ability of the Billionaires to creatively inspire and invite civic participation, which resulted in the self-organization of more than 70 "spin off" Billionaires for Bush chapters.The second case I examine is "Scenarios from Africa," an HIV/AIDS-related communication process in Senegal centered on a script writing contest for young people implemented voluntarily by a vast network of community based organizations.I discuss how the contest promotes youth agency in Senegal, allowing contest participants to shift from their traditional role as targets of information campaigns to instead become creators of HIV prevention content.Finally, I present the "invitational" Cultura Ciudadana (civic culture) communication strategy employed by Antanas Mockus, the former mayor of Professors at New York University who believed in me, got me excited about research and assured me that I had "what it takes" to pursue a doctorate.I thank Arvind Singhal for proving that it is possible to write academic books that have photos, drawings and stories.I also thank him for a well timed "Mother Teresa story," from which I learned that there is a difference between being anti-war and being pro-peace.I am very grateful to Bill Rawlins for his support and encouragement, and especially for writing "Rock on!" in the margins of my earliest papers as a Doctoral student.His love of dialogic theory was contagious and I am grateful to him for exposing me to the writings of Martin Buber, Mikhail Bakhtin and Gregory Bateson.I thank Rafael Obregon for introducing me to two new worlds; Colombia and the world of Latin American communication theory.Rafael has been a constant supporter and a source of inspiration through his work and writing on social change.I thank Greg Shepherd for introducing me to the Pragmatists and for fanning the flames of my belief in community and in meliorism.I also appreciate the careful attention Greg paid to my writing and the word choices I have made; his feedback and encouragement led to much improved and expanded chapters.I thank Devika Chawla who has more-than-generously supported and mentored me since my first year at Ohio University.Devika has helped me become a better writer and she has taught me just about everything I currently know about academic life.Devika Chawla and Ani Ruhil have been a constant source of vi support, guidance, and (no small detail), hot and delicious meals when I most needed them.I am extremely grateful to various individuals and institutions on the Ohio
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,012 | 0,013 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,016 | 0,050 |
| Communication savante | 0,017 | 0,021 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,014 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,005 | 0,006 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,012 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».