MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W227017415

Light in Dark Spaces: A Review of Allan Sekula and Noel Burch's Film Essay the Forgotten Space (2010)

2012· review· en· W227017415 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jill Glessing

Notice bibliographique

RevueCineaction! · 2012
Typereview
Langueen
DomaineEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
ThématiqueCinema and Media Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésFilmmakingMarxist philosophyPoliticsMedia studiesMovie theaterCorporationSociologyPopularityJuryPopular cultureAestheticsLawPolitical scienceArt historyArt
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

A striking media trend today is the popularity of the documentary film genre, particularly those that offer social or political critiques. Think of the Canadian film, The Corporation, or any of Michael Moore's condemnations of corporate America. Viewers, weary and wary of the usual fare of commercial fictions and the increasingly propagandistic tone of the news media, want alternatives: 'the facts' of documentary filmmaking. The rise of popular protest movements around the world, as responses to globalized neoliberalism and more recent financial crises have further driven the desire for information sources beyond the compromised channels of commercial media. We want to know. Moreover, filmmakers Allan Sekula and Noel Burch have argued that there is need to understand these things in a deeper way than the culture of the popular documentary film, which has opened itself up in good ways to current political problems. (1) Indeed, they wanted to make a more openly Marxist film ... to redeem in the discourse of film the criticality of a Marxist way of looking at the world. Their film-essay, The Forgotten Space, was the result. Although well received at its September 2010 Venice premier, where it was awarded the Special Orizzonti Jury Prize, further attention seemed to develop slowly. However, recent screenings at the Tate Modern in London, the Museum of Modern Art in New York, and other venues, have been generating increasing interest. The film's timely production led the filmmakers beyond their initial focus--the technological basis of globalization and its effects on the working classes--to include the deepening current global financial crisis. This has added weight and relevance to the film's Marxist critique of contemporary capitalism. Collaborative Spaces After years of discussion, long time friends Allan Sekula and Noel Burch collaborated on The Forgotten Space. Burch, a Marxist film critic, filmmaker and American exile in France for most of his life, is best known for his early formalist film analysis in his 1973 book Theory of Film Practice. (2) But Burch's later contribution to film theory considered the development of film conventions within their socio-economic context, particularly their historical formation within western capitalism. He distinguished between the 'Primitive Mode of Representation' that characterized early film development, and a later 'Institutional Mode of Representation', when film language became codified to correspond to the dominant scopic regime--a spectatorship of control and identification with the camera. Burch also co founded and directed the alternative French film school, Institut de Formation Cinematographique. Despite his reputation as a theorist, Burch considers himself primarily a filmmaker, having directed over twenty films, most of which were experiments in the documentary form that departed from the totalizing space of bourgeois film. Burch's deep, life long engagement with film practice, history, and theory are apparent in his direction of The Forgotten Space. Sekula's contribution to the film was mainly conception and writing, although he also provided some independently shot footage. Allan Sekula has also spent much of his career as a scholar and artist, as a photography historian and photography-based mixed media artist. He has taught at the California Institute of the Arts since 1985. Besides sharing Burch's political sympathies, Sekula has also critically examined systems of visual representation, notably in his 1984 book, Photography against the Grain: Essays and Photo Works. (3) There he considers the function of social documentary photography within class and power relations. And like Burch has done in film, Sekula has explored alternative documentary strategies in his respective media of photography and text, specifically through the epistemological and aesthetic lens of 'critical realism'. Sekula's gallery exhibitions and books have incorporated photographs, slide projection, spoken sound recordings and text panels. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,012
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,032

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,007
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0050,007
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,004
Communication savante0,0060,006
Science ouverte0,0020,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0040,006
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0050,003

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,065
Tête enseignante GPT0,277
Écart entre enseignants0,212 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2012
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCineaction!Même sujetCinema and Media StudiesTravaux en français237 207